Page 230 - Demo

Appendices228Supplementary Table 6 – Effect sizes for the ordinal regressions between attractiveness rating and longterm rating per modality. Modality Dependent Predictor Rater sex Median OR CrI 89% pd d Nvisual attractiveness long-term female 8.14 [1.30] 6.33; 10.61 1 1.16 [0.09]482visual attractiveness long-term male 7.86 [1.18] 6.23; 10.11 1 1.14 [0.08]visual long-term attractiveness female 7.11 [1.31] 5.27; 9.68 1 1.08 [0.10]visual long-term attractiveness male 14.04 [2.85] 10.22; 19.60 1 1.46 [0.11]auditory attractiveness long-term female 11.82 [1.99] 9.08; 15.63 1 1.36 [0.09]481 auditory attractiveness long-term male 12.75 [2.08] 9.88; 16.89 1 1.40 [0.09]auditory long-term attractiveness female 12.20 [1.94] 9.47; 15.87 1 1.38 [0.09]auditory long-term attractiveness male 16.95 [2.99] 12.89; 22.66 1 1.56 [0.10]olfactory attractiveness long-term female 9.96 [1.38] 8.02; 12.52 1 1.27 [0.08]523 olfactory attractiveness long-term male 8.93 [1.30] 7.15; 11.47 1 1.21 [0.08]olfactory long-term attractiveness female 10.2 [1.70] 7.86; 13.41 1 1.28 [0.09]olfactory long-term attractiveness male 12.36 [2.40] 9.12; 17.03 1 1.39 [0.11]Supplementary Table 7 – Model table for the independent logistic regressions, separately testing the effect of attractiveness in each modality on propensity to date again. Propensity to date againPredictors Odds RatiosCI (89%) Odds Ratios CI (89%) Odds RatiosCI (89%)Intercept 0.63 0.39 – 1.04 0.39 0.22 – 0.69 0.27 0.16 – 0.46rater sex [M] 1.63 0.92 – 2.81 1.44 0.77 – 2.64 1.81 0.99 – 3.27visual attractiveness 2.01 1.59 – 2.61rater sex [M]:visual attractiveness1.45 1.04 – 2.05auditory attractiveness1.26 0.98 – 1.65rater sex [M]:auditory attractiveness1.03 0.74 – 1.44olfactory attractiveness0.82 0.66 – 0.99rater sex [M]:olfactory attractiveness1.33 1.01 – 1.76Random effects Estimate CI (89%) Estimate CI (89%) Estimate CI (89%)sd [Intercept] participant0.98 0.60 – 1.40 1.24 0.85 – 1.68 1.28 0.92 – 1.69sd [attractiveness rating] participant0.23 0.02 – 0.53 0.36 0.07 – 0.65 0.14 0.01 – 0.34sd [Intercept] partner 1.10 0.74 – 1.51 1.55 1.14 – 2.02 1.51 1.14 – 1.95N 58 participant 59 participant 67 participant59 partner 58 partner 67 partnerObservations 482 481 533Tom Roth.indd 228 08-01-2024 10:42