Page 226 - Demo

Appendices224Appendix B: Supplementary Material for Chapter 3Supplementary Table 1 - Model table for the logistic regressions predicting propensity to date again from post-date attractiveness and long-term partner suitability ratings.PredictorsPropensity to date againOdds Ratios CI (89%) Odds Ratios CI (89%)Intercept 0.21 0.12 – 0.34 0.39 0.23 – 0.64rater sex [M] 1.31 0.74 – 2.35 1.47 0.82 – 2.60post-date attractiveness 5.68 4.00 – 8.41rater sex [M]:post-date attractiveness 1.88 1.18 – 3.04post-date long-term rating 5.59 3.98 – 8.16rater sex [M]:post-date long-term rating 1.69 1.07 – 2.71Random effects Estimate CI (89%) Estimate CI (89%)sd [Intercept] participant 1.10 0.65 – 1.58 1.41 0.94 – 1.94sd [post-date attractiveness] participant 0.38 0.05 – 0.77sd [post-date long-term rating] participant 0.38 0.06 – 0.76sd [Intercept] partner 1.08 0.62 – 1.57 0.95 0.39 – 1.50N 67 pp 67 pp67 partner 67 partnerObservations 554 554Supplementary Table 2 – Effect sizes for the logistic regressions predicting propensity to date again from post-date attractiveness and long-term partner suitability ratings.’Predictor Rater sex Median OR CrI 89% pd d Nattractiveness female 5.68 [1.30] 4.00; 8.41 1.00 0.96 [0.13]554attractiveness male 10.61 [3.06] 6.92; 17.92 1.00 1.30 [0.16]long-term female 5.59 [1.24] 3.98; 8.16 1.00 0.95 [0.12]long-term male 9.37 [2.61] 6.14; 15.53 1.00 1.23 [0.16]Tom Roth.indd 224 08-01-2024 10:42