Page 95 - Demo

3Dkidneymodels935Figure2Questionnaireresultsaboutconventionalimaging3DPrintsandARHologramsSurgeonsscoredthe visibility of the 4 anatomical structures from1 to 5(1indicates completely disagree;2 disagree; 3neutral;4 agree; and5completely agree) forconventionalimaging(MRI and/or CT) and for the3D visualizations(3DprintandARholograms) withresultsshowing thecomparisonofmeansof10patientsCenterlinesindicatethemedians;errorbarstheinterquartilerangesaP<01comparedwithMRI/CT.bP<001comparedwithMRI/CT.ASSESSMENTOFALL4ANATOMICALSTRUCTURESBoth3DprintandARhologramsledtobetterassessmentofthetumor,arteriesveinsandurinarycollectionstructurescomparedwithconventionalimaging(Figure2andTable2)(tumormedianscoresforconventionalimaging407;interquartilerangeIQR362-415vs3Dprint467;IQR414-471;P=008andARhologram471;IQR426-475;P=002;arteriesconventionalimaging362;IQR343-393 vs3Dprint 454;IQR 432-471;P=002andARhologram 483;IQR 464-486;P<001;veinsconventionalimaging346;IQR339-362vs3Dprint450;IQR439-468;P<001andARhologram483;IQR471-486;P<001;andurinarycollectingstructuresconventionalimaging276;IQR243-300vs3Dprint386;IQR364-439;P<001andARhologram400;IQR393-458;P<001) Therewasnosignificantdifferencebetweenconventionalimagingand3DprintingorARinindividualcasesDatafromallindividualcasesandthecorrespondingassessmentofthe pediatricsurgeonsisshownintheeFigureintheSupplement