Page 87 - Demo

85Replication of Maner et al. (2005)4Table 2. Overview of the Gaussian multilevel model predicting men’s sexualarousal ratings as a function of Target Attractiveness, Target Skin Color,and ConditionPredictors Median b 95% HDI pdIntercept 2.78 2.50 – 3.07 100%Condition [Control] -0.10 -0.50 – 0.29 69%Condition [White Protagonist] 0.07 -0.32 – 0.46 63%Skin Color [Black] -0.22 -0.39 – -0.05 99%Attractiveness [High] 0.74 0.57 – 0.91 100%Condition [Control] × Skin Color [Black] 0.13 -0.11 – 0.37 85%Condition [White Protagonist] × Skin Color [Black] 0.06 -0.18 – 0.30 68%Condition [Control] × Attractiveness [High] 0.00 -0.23 – 0.25 51%Condition [White Protagonist] × Attractiveness [High] -0.04 -0.28 – 0.19 63%Skin Color [Black] × Attractiveness [High] -0.22 -0.39 – -0.05 99%Condition [Control] × Skin Color [Black] × Attractiveness [High] 0.07 -0.16 – 0.31 73%Condition [White Protagonist] × Skin Color [Black] × Attractiveness [High] -0.09 -0.33 – 0.15 77%Random EffectsSD(Participant) 0.87Figure 1. Estimated marginal means of the posterior distribution for sexualarousal ratings as a function of Skin Color (Black vs. White) and TargetAttractiveness (High vs. Medium). The points reflect the median and the errorbars the 66% to 95% Highest Density Interval (HDI).Table 3. Overview of the ordinal cumulative multilevel model predicting men’s sexual arousal ratings as a function of TargetAttractiveness, Target Skin Color, and ConditionPredictors Median OR 95% HDI pd dIntercept[1] 0.71[0.12] 0.51–1.01 97% 0.19[0.09]Intercept[2] 1.49[0.26] 1.05–2.08 99% 0.22[0.1]Intercept[3] 2.91[0.52] 2.05–4.18 100% 0.59[0.1]Intercept[4] 5.32[1.01] 3.67–7.85 100% 0.92[0.11]Intercept[5] 8.31[1.69] 5.64–12.55 100% 1.17[0.11]Intercept[6] 18.79[4.40] 11.94–30.27 100% 1.62[0.13]Intercept[7] 40.58[11.36] 23.81–71.52 100% 2.04[0.16]Intercept[8] 335.51[188.61] 112.17–1199.91 100% 3.21[0.33]Condition[Control] 0.90[0.19] 0.58–1.35 69% 0.06[0.11]Condition[White Protagonist] 1.09[0.22] 0.72–1.65 66% 0.05[0.11]Skin Color[Black] 0.79[0.07] 0.66–0.94 100% 0.13[0.05]Attractiveness[High] 2.10[0.20] 1.75–2.53 100% 0.41[0.05]Condition[Control] × Skin Color[Black] 1.11[0.14] 0.87–1.42 79% 0.06 [0.07]Condition[White Protagonist] × Skin Color[Black] 1.03[0.13] 0.80–1.30 59% 0.02[0.07]Condition[Control] × Attractiveness[High] 1.06[0.13] 0.83–1.34 67% 0.03[0.07]Condition[White Protagonist] × Attractiveness[High] 0.88[0.11] 0.69–1.12 84% 0.07[0.07]Skin Color[Black] × Attractiveness[High] 0.87[0.08] 0.73–1.03 94% 0.08[0.05]Condition[Control] × Skin Color[Black] × Attractiveness[High] 1.12[0.14] 0.88–1.43 82% 0.06[0.07]Condition[White Protagonist] × Skin Color[Black] × Attractiveness[High] 0.92[0.11] 0.72–1.16 76% 0.05[0.07]Random EffectsSD(Participant) 1.05Table 2. Overview of the Gaussian multilevel model predicting men’s sexualarousal ratings as a function of Target Attractiveness, Target Skin Color,and ConditionPredictors Median b 95% HDI pdIntercept 2.78 2.50 – 3.07 100%Condition [Control] -0.10 -0.50 – 0.29 69%Condition [White Protagonist] 0.07 -0.32 – 0.46 63%Skin Color [Black] -0.22 -0.39 – -0.05 99%Attractiveness [High] 0.74 0.57 – 0.91 100%Condition [Control] × Skin Color [Black] 0.13 -0.11 – 0.37 85%Condition [White Protagonist] × Skin Color [Black] 0.06 -0.18 – 0.30 68%Condition [Control] × Attractiveness [High] 0.00 -0.23 – 0.25 51%Condition [White Protagonist] × Attractiveness [High] -0.04 -0.28 – 0.19 63%Skin Color [Black] × Attractiveness [High] -0.22 -0.39 – -0.05 99%Condition [Control] × Skin Color [Black] × Attractiveness [High] 0.07 -0.16 – 0.31 73%Condition [White Protagonist] × Skin Color [Black] × Attractiveness [High] -0.09 -0.33 – 0.15 77%Random EffectsSD(Participant) 0.87Figure 1. Estimated marginal means of the posterior distribution for sexualarousal ratings as a function of Skin Color (Black vs. White) and TargetAttractiveness (High vs. Medium). The points reflect the median and the errorbars the 66% to 95% Highest Density Interval (HDI).Table 2. Overview of the Gaussian multilevel model predicting men’s sexualarousal ratings as a function of Target Attractiveness, Target Skin Color,and ConditionPredictors Median b 95% HDI pdIntercept 2.78 2.50 – 3.07 100%Condition [Control] -0.10 -0.50 – 0.29 69%Condition [White Protagonist] 0.07 -0.32 – 0.46 63%Skin Color [Black] -0.22 -0.39 – -0.05 99%Attractiveness [High] 0.74 0.57 – 0.91 100%Condition [Control] × Skin Color [Black] 0.13 -0.11 – 0.37 85%Condition [White Protagonist] × Skin Color [Black] 0.06 -0.18 – 0.30 68%Condition [Control] × Attractiveness [High] 0.00 -0.23 – 0.25 51%Condition [White Protagonist] × Attractiveness [High] -0.04 -0.28 – 0.19 63%Skin Color [Black] × Attractiveness [High] -0.22 -0.39 – -0.05 99%Condition [Control] × Skin Color [Black] × Attractiveness [High] 0.07 -0.16 – 0.31 73%Condition [White Protagonist] × Skin Color [Black] × Attractiveness [High] -0.09 -0.33 – 0.15 77%Random EffectsSD(Participant) 0.87Figure 1. Estimated marginal means of the posterior distribution for sexualarousal ratings as a function of Skin Color (Black vs. White) and TargetAttractiveness (High vs. Medium). The points reflect the median and the errorbars the 66% to 95% Highest Density Interval (HDI).Table 3. Overview of the ordinal cumulative multilevel model predicting men’s sexual arousal ratings as a function of TargetAttractiveness, Target Skin Color, and ConditionPredictors Median OR 95% HDI pd dIntercept[1] 0.71[0.12] 0.51–1.01 97% 0.19[0.09]Intercept[2] 1.49[0.26] 1.05–2.08 99% 0.22[0.1]Intercept[3] 2.91[0.52] 2.05–4.18 100% 0.59[0.1]Intercept[4] 5.32[1.01] 3.67–7.85 100% 0.92[0.11]Intercept[5] 8.31[1.69] 5.64–12.55 100% 1.17[0.11]Intercept[6] 18.79[4.40] 11.94–30.27 100% 1.62[0.13]Intercept[7] 40.58[11.36] 23.81–71.52 100% 2.04[0.16]Intercept[8] 335.51[188.61] 112.17–1199.91 100% 3.21[0.33]Condition[Control] 0.90[0.19] 0.58–1.35 69% 0.06[0.11]Condition[White Protagonist] 1.09[0.22] 0.72–1.65 66% 0.05[0.11]Skin Color[Black] 0.79[0.07] 0.66–0.94 100% 0.13[0.05]Attractiveness[High] 2.10[0.20] 1.75–2.53 100% 0.41[0.05]Condition[Control] × Skin Color[Black] 1.11[0.14] 0.87–1.42 79% 0.06 [0.07]Condition[White Protagonist] × Skin Color[Black] 1.03[0.13] 0.80–1.30 59% 0.02[0.07]Condition[Control] × Attractiveness[High] 1.06[0.13] 0.83–1.34 67% 0.03[0.07]Condition[White Protagonist] × Attractiveness[High] 0.88[0.11] 0.69–1.12 84% 0.07[0.07]Skin Color[Black] × Attractiveness[High] 0.87[0.08] 0.73–1.03 94% 0.08[0.05]Condition[Control] × Skin Color[Black] × Attractiveness[High] 1.12[0.14] 0.88–1.43 82% 0.06[0.07]Condition[White Protagonist] × Skin Color[Black] × Attractiveness[High] 0.92[0.11] 0.72–1.16 76% 0.05[0.07]Random EffectsSD(Participant) 1.05Iliana Samara 17x24.indd 85 08-04-2024 16:35