Page 83 - Demo
P. 83


                                    81Replication of Maner et al. (2005)4Table 1. Information (code, age, attractiveness ratings) regarding the target faces of the Chicago Face Database employed in the present studyCFD code Skin Color Gender Age AttractivenessBF-223 Black Female 26.86 High (4.46)BF-247 Black Female 25.48 High (4.48)BM-227 Black Male 22.52 High (4.11)BM-215 Black Male 22.42 High (4.11)WF-207 White Female 24.88 High (4.46)WF-236 White Female 26.38 High (4.58)WM-242 White Male 23.07 High (4.03)WM-009 White Male 23.70 High (4.08)BF-021 Black Female 26.41 Average (3.05)BF-031 Black Female 26.34 Average (3.02)BM-028 Black Male 24.36 Average (3.00)BM-216 Black Male 24.72 Average (3.00)WF-036 White Female 22.64 Average (2.90)WF-005 White Female 22.39 Average (3.03)WM-040 White Male 25.12 Average (3.05)WM-026 White Male 22.39 Average (3.03)that research has shown that emotions, in general, can still be detected because people can subconsciously notice subtle microexpressions on people’sfaces. People are especially accurate when they make their judgments basedon their immediate gut reaction about what the emotion is, so you shouldtry to go with your gut reactions to the people in the photos.” (p. 67)Then, participants performed the experimental task. The task was presented using E-prime (Eprime version 3; Psychology Software Tools, Pittsburgh, PA). Each trial started with a centrally presented target stimulusshown for 1 s. Then, participants indicated how sexually aroused, fearful,happy, or angry they perceived the person depicted on a 9-point scale using the corresponding keyboard key. Participants performed 8 (Experiment1) or 16 trials (Experiment 2) in total. After completing the task, participants filled in the revised Sociosexual Orientation Inventory (SOI-R; Penke& Asendorpf, 2008) and the Belief in a Dangerous World (BDW; Altemeyer,1988) questionnaires to measure one’s propensity to a) engage in casual relationships and b) perceive their surroundings as safe and secure, respectively.Finally, participants were debriefed about the aim of the study. The studylasted approximately 15 minutes.Statistical AnalysesSexual arousal (Experiment 1) and anger (Experiment 2) target face ratings were analyzed using Bayesian multilevel modeling (MLM). We optedfor Bayesian MLMs so we could both account for the nested data and quanIliana Samara 17x24.indd 81 08-04-2024 16:35
                                
   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87