Page 234 - Demo

Chapter 7232Table 2. continued.Authors Study aim(s) Compliance and drop-out Acceptability and feasibility of ESMPrice et al. (2015)To investigate how cognitive fatigue can be accurately assessed in real-time through the use of mobile assistive technology.Not reported Not reportedSchneider et al. (2020)To investigate affect, stress, and affective reactivity to daily environmental stressors in adults with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome.Four participants (13%) with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome were excluded because of a compliance of <33%. The compliance of the participants in the analysis sample was 68% (healthy controls: 78%).Researchers’ notes: a subgroup of participants required additional monitoring.Wilson et al. (2020)To explore feasibility, reliability, and validity of an experience sampling application for people with intellectual disability.The average compliance was 34%. The compliance of participants who lived independently was higher compared to those who lived with family (35% vs. 22%, U = 55, p < 0.05). The compliance of participants who were unemployed was higher than those who were employed (69% vs. 25%, U = 3, p < 0.05). Participants enjoyed taking part in the study and reported willingness to participate in similar studies. Most participants found the device easy to use. Reasons for non-compliance included: being elsewhere, not hearing the notifications, or technical difficulties with the device. Participants and parents of participants recommended longer and louder prompts, specific language, and pictographs to aid understanding. Adequate internal consistency and face validity of the experience sampling data.Annelieke Muller sHL.indd 232 16-11-2023 09:26