Page 226 - Demo
P. 226


                                    Chapter 7224The focus group was organised after four participants completed testing the second application. Participants received compensation in the form of paying the costs for a group activity. This study has been approved by the ethical review board of the Amsterdam UMC in the Netherlands.Data analysisThe interview transcripts were coded using deductive thematic analysis by two researchers, following the steps described by Braun and Clarke (2006).20 The themes were predefined based on three domains of the Care Framework described by Levesque et al. (2013): acceptability (satisfaction with use of the service), availability (opportunity or capacity to use the service), and appropriateness (fit between the service and client needs). The analysis steps were as follows:20 1) both researchers read the transcripts to become familiar with the data; 2) both researchers independently coded two of the same interviews; 3) differences in coding were discussed in a meeting, after consensus was reached about the codes and fit with the themes; 4) the researchers coded a third interview together and discussed the codes and fit with the themes, initial sub-themes were created; 5) both researchers independently coded another two of the same interviews; 6) differences in coding were discussed in a meeting, after consensus was reached about the codes and fit with the main and sub-themes; 7) the codes, main and sub-themes were discussed with the research team, after which consensus was reached about the themes and sub-themes; 8) the remaining interviews were divided for coding between the two researchers. After the twelfth interview, data saturation was discussed. The same themes and sub-themes were used for coding the focus group transcript. ATLAS.ti Mac (Version 23.0.1) was used for analysing the data.ResultsScoping reviewSelection and characteristics of sources of evidenceA total of 971 studies were screened on relevance based on the title and abstract. Two reviewers both screened 50% of selected studies, with an overlap of 10% (agreement: 96%). Discrepancies were solved through Annelieke Muller sHL.indd 224 14-11-2023 09:07
                                
   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230