Page 221 - Demo
P. 221


                                    Experience sampling methods for mental health research in intellectual disability2197MethodScoping reviewProtocol and registrationThe protocol for the scoping review was drafted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P)16and was registered on Open Science Framework on 6 December 2022: https://osf.io/qkn8y/?view_only=8007c9f0757b430ab9091a786e2b20df. Eligibility criteriaStudies were eligible for inclusion if primary (i.e., original) research was reported (any design), participants were children, adolescents or adults with intellectual disability or with genetic neurodevelopmental disorders associated with intellectual disability, and experience sampling methods were digital, self-administered, and used for assessing mental health. Studies using the daily diary method were also included. We used a broad definition of mental health to include psychological and emotional well-being, including quality of life. Only studies in English or Dutch, or other languages that could be understood using Google Translate were included. Excluded from the review were studies targeting elderly with neurodegenerative conditions.Search strategyThe search date was 2 December 2022, and the search was updated on 12 May 2023. The following databases were sought: IEEE Xplore, Lens, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Zotero (version 6.0.26) was used for compiling the references. After removing duplicates, the references were uploaded in Rayyan software17 for title and abstract screening. The final search strategy for all databases can be found on Open Science Framework:https://osf.io/qkn8y/?view_only=8007c9f0757b430ab9091a786e2b20df. Study selectionStudies were first selected based on the title and abstract by two reviewers, who both screened 50% of the selected items. To reduce bias, 10% of the records were double-screened, after which interrater reliability was calculated. Discrepancies between the reviewers were solved through discussion. After the title and abstract screening, two researchers reviewed Annelieke Muller sHL.indd 219 14-11-2023 09:07
                                
   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225