Page 184 - Demo

Supplemental Material182Annex D: Supplemental material Chapter 6Table D1. The findings of the empirical chapters with respect to the aspects of visualisation meaning,making introduced as a conceptual framework.Aspect(s) of meaningmakingSubquestion(s)Chapter(s) FindingsType and content1 2, 3 and 4  Extensive use of photographs and datarelated visualisations (in energy controversies: infographics and maps; in food controversies: infographics, charts and diagrams) Opponents’ distinct use of ‘scientific’ visualisations Repeated content (in energy controversies: natural and industrial landscapes, people, flames; in food controversies: people interacting with food, miniature pellets or particles, abundance of food and scientists or scientific activity) Proponents’ use of visualisations of officials (energy) and people producing food (food) Opponents’ use of visualisations of landscape and protesters (energy)Type and content; Circulation1 and 3 2 and 5  Association between visualisation type and content and actors’ stance in the controversy:o More types of visualisations and content are used as opponents became more dominant (energy) Association between visualisation type and content and the evolution of the controversy:o Increased use of data visualisations as the controversy intensified (energy)o Decreased use of visualisations of officials as the controversy intensified (energy)Type and content; Narrative1 and 2 3  Photographs overtly narrating a storyline and data visualisations narrating a storyline more subtly (energy) Maps differentiating between two storylines by adding a layer of data; infographics doing the same by using a visual technique (energy)Efrat.indd 182 19-09-2023 11:39