Page 267 - Demo
P. 267


                                    Bibliography265BCooper, V. J., & Hosey, G. R. (2003). Sexual dichromatism and female preference in Eulemur fulvussubspecies. International Journal of Primatology, 24(6), 1177–1188. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:IJOP.0000005986.21477.adCornwell, R. E., Boothroyd, L., Burt, D. M., Feinberg, D. R., Jones, B. C., Little, A. C., Pitman, R., Whiten, S., & Perrett, D. I. (2004). Concordant preferences for opposite–sex signals? Human pheromones and facial characteristics. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 271(1539), 635–640. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2003.2649Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1992). Cognitive adaptations for social exchange. In The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 163–228). Oxford University Press.Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (2013). Evolutionary psychology: New perspectives on cognition and motivation. Annual Review of Psychology, 64(1), 201–229. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.121208.131628Courtiol, A., Etienne, L., Feron, R., Godelle, B., & Rousset, F. (2016). The evolution of mutual mate choice under direct benefits. The American Naturalist, 188(5), 521–538. https://doi.org/10.1086/688658Craig, D. P. A., & Abramson, C. I. (2018). Ordinal pattern analysis in comparative psychology—A flexible alternative to null hypothesis significance testing using an observation oriented modeling paradigm. International Journal of Comparative Psychology, 31(0). https://doi.org/10.46867/ijcp.2018.31.01.10Cronin, K. A., Mitchell, M. A., Lonsdorf, E. V., & Thompson, S. D. (2006). One year later: Evaluation of PMCrecommended births and transfers. Zoo Biology, 25(4), 267–277. https://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.20100Damon, F., Li, Z., Yan, Y., Li, W., Guo, K., Quinn, P. C., Pascalis, O., & Méary, D. (2019). Preference for attractive faces is species-specific. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 133, 262–271. https://doi.org/10.1037/com0000148Damon, F., Méary, D., Quinn, P. C., Lee, K., Simpson, E. A., Paukner, A., Suomi, S. J., & Pascalis, O. (2017). Preference for facial averageness: Evidence for a common mechanism in human and macaque infants. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 46303. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep46303Damon, F., Mottier, H., Méary, D., & Pascalis, O. (2017). A review of attractiveness preferences in infancy: From faces to objects. Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology, 3(4), 321–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40750-017-0071-2Darwin, C. R. (1871). The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. John Murray.Dawson, S. J., & Chivers, M. L. (2016). Gender-specificity of initial and controlled visual attention to sexual stimuli in androphilic women and gynephilic men. PLoS ONE, 11(4), e0152785. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152785Dawson, S. J., & Chivers, M. L. (2018). The effect of static versus dynamic stimuli on visual processing of sexual cues in androphilic women and gynephilic men. Royal Society Open Science, 5(6), 172286. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.172286Deaner, R. O., Khera, A. V., & Platt, M. L. (2005). Monkeys pay per vie Adaptive valuation of social images by rhesus macaques. Current Biology, 15(6), 543–548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2005.01.044Deaner, R. O., Shepherd, S. V., & Platt, M. L. (2007). Familiarity accentuates gaze cuing in women but not men. Biology Letters, 3(1), 65–68. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2006.0564DeBruine, L., & Jones, B. (2017). Young Adult White Faces with Manipulated Versions. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.4220517.v1DeCasien, A. R., & Higham, J. P. (2019). Primate mosaic brain evolution reflects selection on sensory and cognitive specialization. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 3(10), 1483–1493. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-019-0969-0Delgado, R. A. (2006). Sexual selection in the loud calls of male primates: Signal content and function. International Journal of Primatology, 27(1), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10764-005-9001-4Delgado, R. A., Lameira, A. R., Davila Ross, M., Husson, S. J., Morrogh-Bernard, H. C., & Wich, S. A. (2008). Geographical variation in orangutan long calls. In S. A. Wich, S. S. Utami Atmoko, T. M. Setia, & C. P. van Schaik (Red.), Orangutans: Geographic Variation in Behavioral Ecology and Conservation (pp. 215–224). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199213276.003.0014Delgado, R. A., & Schaik, C. P. V. (2000). The behavioral ecology and conservation of the orangutan (Pongo pygmaeus): A tale of two islands. Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews, 9(5), 201–218. https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6505(2000)9:5<201::AID-EVAN2>3.0.CO;2-YDemattè, M. L., Österbauer, R., & Spence, C. (2007). Olfactory cues modulate facial attractiveness. Chemical Senses, 32(6), 603–610. https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjm030Tom Roth.indd 265 08-01-2024 10:42
                                
   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271