Page 268 - Demo

Bibliography266Depaoli, S., & van de Schoot, R. (2017). Improving transparency and replication in Bayesian statistics: The WAMBS-Checklist. Psychological Methods, 22(2), 240–261. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000065Dion, K., Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. (1972). What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24(3), 285–290. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0033731Dixson, A. F. (2012). Primate Sexuality: Comparative Studies of the Prosimians, Monkeys, Apes, and Humans (2nd edition). Oxford University Press.Dixson, A. F. (2018). Copulatory and postcopulatory sexual selection in primates. Folia Primatologica, 89(3–4), 258–286. https://doi.org/10.1159/000488105Dixson, A. F., Dixson, B., & Anderson, M. (2005). Sexual selection and the evolution of visually conspicuous sexually dimorphic traits in male monkeys, apes, and human beings. Annual Review of Sex Research, 16(1), 1–19.Dotsch, R., & Todorov, A. (2012). Reverse correlating social face perception. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(5), 562–571. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550611430272Draheim, C., Mashburn, C. A., Martin, J. D., & Engle, R. W. (2019). Reaction time in differential and developmental research: A review and commentary on the problems and alternatives. Psychological Bulletin, 145(5), 508–535. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000192Drea, C. M. (2015). D’scent of man: A comparative survey of primate chemosignaling in relation to sex. Hormones and Behavior, 68, 117–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2014.08.001Dubuc, C., Allen, W. L., Cascio, J., Lee, D. S., Maestripieri, D., Petersdorf, M., Winters, S., & Higham, J. P. (2016). Who cares? Experimental attention biases provide new insights into a mammalian sexual signal. Behavioral Ecology, 27(1), 68–74. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arv117Dukas, R. (1998). Constraints on information processing and their effects on behavior. In Cognitive ecology: The evolutionary ecology of information processing and decision making (pp. 89–127). University of Chicago Press.Durgavich, L. S., Harwell, F. S., & Knott, C. D. (2023). A composite menstrual cycle of captive orangutans, with associated hormonal and behavioral variability. American Journal of Primatology, 85(3), e23420. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.23420Eastwick, P. W., Eagly, A. H., Finkel, E. J., & Johnson, S. E. (2011). Implicit and explicit preferences for physical attractiveness in a romantic partner: A double dissociation in predictive validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(5), 993–1011. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024061Eastwick, P. W., & Finkel, E. J. (2008). Sex differences in mate preferences revisited: Do people know what they initially desire in a romantic partner? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(2), 245–264. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.2.245Eastwick, P. W., Finkel, E. J., & Joel, S. (2023). Mate evaluation theory. Psychological Review, 130, 211–241. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000360Eastwick, P. W., Luchies, L. B., Finkel, E. J., & Hunt, L. L. (2014). The many voices of Darwin’s descendants: Reply to Schmitt (2014). Psychological Bulletin, 140(3), 673–681. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036111Ebner, N. C. (2008). Age of face matters: Age-group differences in ratings of young and old faces. Behavior Research Methods, 40(1), 130–136. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.1.130Ebner, N. C., Luedicke, J., Voelkle, M. C., Riediger, M., Lin, T., & Lindenberger, U. (2018). An adult developmental approach to perceived facial attractiveness and distinctiveness. Frontiers in Psychology, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00561Elaut, E., Bogaert, V., De Cuypere, G., Weyers, S., Gijs, L., Kaufman, J.-M., & T’Sjoen, G. (2010). Contribution of androgen receptor sensitivity to the relation between testosterone and sexual desire: An exploration in male-to-female transsexuals. Journal of Endocrinological Investigation, 33(1), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03346547Emery Thompson, M., Zhou, A., & Knott, C. D. (2012). Low testosterone correlates with delayed development in male orangutans. PloS ONE, 7(10), e47282. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0047282Farley, S. D. (2014). Nonverbal reactions to an attractive stranger: The role of mimicry in communicating preferred social distance. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 38(2), 195–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-014-0174-4Farley, S. D., Hughes, S. M., & LaFayette, J. N. (2013). People will know we are in love: Evidence of differences between vocal samples directed toward lovers and friends. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 37(3), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-013-0151-3Tom Roth.indd 266 08-01-2024 10:42