Page 243 - Demo

Appendices241ASupplementary Table 12 - Model table for the Bayesian zero-one inflated beta regression predicting Looking time proportion to the left picture from Pre-date attractiveness rating and Gender. This analysis was performed on the complete cases-dataset.PredictorsLeft biasEstimates CI (95%)Intercept 0.95 0.88 – 1.03phi_Intercept 5.64 4.55 – 7.03zoi_Intercept 0.02 0.01 – 0.06coi_Intercept 0.83 0.30 – 2.13AttractivenessLeft 1.38 1.32 – 1.45Gender[Female] 0.99 0.92 – 1.08AttractivenessRight 0.70 0.67 – 0.72AttractivenessLeft:Gender[Female] 1.00 0.95 – 1.04Gender[Female]:AttractivenessRight 1.01 0.97 – 1.05phi_AttractivenessLeft 0.95 0.87 – 1.04phi_Gender[Female] 1.02 0.82 – 1.26phi_AttractivenessRight 0.98 0.91 – 1.06phi_AttractivenessLeft:Gender[Female] 0.98 0.90 – 1.07phi_Gender[Female]:AttractivenessRight 1.07 1.00 – 1.16zoi_AttractivenessLeft 1.13 0.89 – 1.44zoi_Gender[Female] 1.04 0.51 – 2.11zoi_AttractivenessRight 1.56 1.25 – 1.98zoi_AttractivenessLeft:Gender[Female] 0.97 0.77 – 1.23zoi_Gender[Female]:AttractivenessRight 0.83 0.65 – 1.04coi_AttractivenessLeft 1.61 1.07 – 2.45coi_Gender[Female] 0.83 0.42 – 1.77coi_ AttractivenessRight 0.48 0.30 – 0.76coi_AttractivenessLeft:Gender[Female] 0.84 0.56 – 1.32coi_Gender[Female]:AttractivenessRight 1.22 0.77 – 2.00Random Effectsσ2 0.01τ00 Subject 0.06N Subject 35Observations 1009Notes: Gender was sum-coded, while Pre-date attractiveness ratings were centered around 4 (the middle option). Estimates for the predictors were exponentiated, so that they represent Odds Ratios for the beta, coi and zoi parameters.Tom Roth.indd 241 08-01-2024 10:42