Page 198 - Demo

196AppendicesTable S24. Model table for the Bayesian zero-one inflated beta regressionpredicting Looking time proportion to the left picture from Pre-date attractiveness rating and Gender. This analysis was performed on the completecases-dataset.Left biasPredictors Estimates CI (95%)Intercept 0.95 0.88 – 1.03phi_Intercept 5.64 4.55 – 7.03zoi_Intercept 0.02 0.01 – 0.06coi_Intercept 0.83 0.30 – 2.13AttractivenessLeft 1.38 1.32 – 1.45Gender[Female] 0.99 0.92 – 1.08AttractivenessRight 0.70 0.67 – 0.72AttractivenessLeft:Gender[Female] 1.00 0.95 – 1.04Gender[Female]:AttractivenessRight 1.01 0.97 – 1.05phi_AttractivenessLeft 0.95 0.87 – 1.04phi_Gender[Female] 1.02 0.82 – 1.26phi_AttractivenessRight 0.98 0.91 – 1.06phi_AttractivenessLeft:Gender[Female] 0.98 0.90 – 1.07phi_Gender[Female]:AttractivenessRight 1.07 1.00 – 1.16zoi_AttractivenessLeft 1.13 0.89 – 1.44zoi_Gender[Female] 1.04 0.51 – 2.11zoi_AttractivenessRight 1.56 1.25 – 1.98zoi_AttractivenessLeft:Gender[Female] 0.97 0.77 – 1.23zoi_Gender[Female]:AttractivenessRight 0.83 0.65 – 1.04coi_AttractivenessLeft 1.61 1.07 – 2.45coi_Gender[Female] 0.83 0.42 – 1.77coi_ AttractivenessRight 0.48 0.30 – 0.76coi_AttractivenessLeft:Gender[Female] 0.84 0.56 – 1.32coi_Gender[Female]:AttractivenessRight 1.22 0.77 – 2.00Random Effectsσ2 0.01τ00Subject 0.06NSubject 35Observations 1009Notes: Gender was sum-coded, while Pre-date attractiveness ratings werecentered around 4 (the middle option). Estimates for the predictors wereexponentiated, so that they represent Odds Ratios for the beta, coi and zoiparameters.Table S25. Model table for the Bayesian zero-one inflated beta regressionpredicting Looking time proportion to the left picture from Post-date attractiveness rating and Gender. This analysis was performed on the completecases-dataset.Left biasPredictors Estimates CI (95%)Intercept 0.93 0.85 – 1.01phi_Intercept 4.49 3.62 – 5.53zoi_Intercept 0.01 0.00 – 0.04coi_Intercept 0.70 0.18 – 2.21AttractivenessLeft 1.21 1.15 – 1.26Gender[Female] 1.01 0.93 – 1.09AttractivenessRight 0.79 0.75 – 0.82AttractivenessLeft:Gender[Female] 0.98 0.94 – 1.02Gender[Female]:AttractivenessRight 1.07 1.02 – 1.11phi_AttractivenessLeft 0.90 0.84 – 0.97phi_Gender[Female] 0.94 0.76 – 1.16phi_AttractivenessRight 1.02 0.95 – 1.10phi_AttractivenessLeft:Gender[Female] 1.03 0.95 – 1.10phi_Gender[Female]:AttractivenessRight 1.00 0.93 – 1.07zoi_AttractivenessLeft 1.26 0.99 – 1.63zoi_Gender[Female] 1.09 0.51 – 2.31zoi_AttractivenessRight 1.60 1.26 – 2.08zoi_AttractivenessLeft:Gender[Female] 1.07 0.84 – 1.36zoi_Gender[Female]:AttractivenessRight 0.79 0.61 – 1.00coi_AttractivenessLeft 1.84 1.19 – 2.95coi_Gender[Female] 0.98 0.46 – 2.23coi_ AttractivenessRight 0.57 0.36 – 0.87coi_AttractivenessLeft:Gender[Female] 0.88 0.56 – 1.45coi_Gender[Female]:AttractivenessRight 1.14 0.73 – 1.80Random Effectsσ2 0.01τ00Subject 0.06NSubject 35Observations 1009Notes: Gender was sum-coded, while Post-date attractiveness ratings werecentered around 4 (the middle option). Estimates for the predictors wereexponentiated, so that they represent Odds Ratios for the beta, coi and zoiparameters.Table S26. Model table for the Bayesian zero-one inflated beta regressionpredicting Looking time proportion to the left picture from Date outcomerating and Gender. This analysis was performed on the complete casesdataset.Left biasPredictors Estimates CI (95%)Intercept 0.87 0.80 – 0.96phi_Intercept 4.19 3.37 – 5.21zoi_Intercept 0.02 0.00 – 0.06coi_Intercept 0.58 0.19 – 1.52DateAgainLeft[Yes] 1.27 1.19 – 1.36Gender[Female] 1.03 0.94 – 1.13DateAgainRight[Yes] 0.76 0.71 – 0.81DateAgainLeft[Yes]:Gender[Female] 0.97 0.90 – 1.04Gender[Female]:DateAgainRight[Yes] 1.03 0.96 – 1.09phi_DateAgainLeft[Yes] 0.86 0.78 – 0.95phi_Gender[Female] 1.03 0.83 – 1.28phi_DateAgainRight[Yes] 1.08 0.98 – 1.21phi_DateAgainLeft[Yes]:Gender[Female] 1.03 0.92 – 1.14phi_Gender[Female]:DateAgainRight[Yes] 1.14 1.03 – 1.27zoi_DateAgainLeft[Yes] 1.37 0.97 – 1.94zoi_Gender[Female] 1.04 0.49 – 2.16zoi_DateAgainRight[Yes] 2.04 1.45 – 2.96zoi_DateAgainLeft[Yes]:Gender[Female] 1.24 0.88 – 1.76zoi_Gender[Female]:DateAgainRight[Yes] 0.80 0.56 – 1.13coi_DateAgainLeft[Yes] 2.34 1.22 – 4.46coi_Gender[Female] 0.84 0.42 – 1.93coi_DateAgainRight[Yes] 0.31 0.16 – 0.59coi_DateAgainLeft[Yes]:Gender[Female] 0.62 0.32 – 1.16coi_Gender[Female]:DateAgainRight[Yes] 0.72 0.37 – 1.35Random Effectsσ2 0.01τ00Subject 0.06NSubject 35Observations 1009Notes: All predictors were sum-coded. Estimates for the predictors wereexponentiated, so that they represent Odds Ratios for the beta, coi and zoiparameters.Iliana Samara 17x24.indd 196 08-04-2024 16:37