Page 42 - Peri-implant health: the effect of implant design and surgical procedure on bone and soft tissue stability
P. 42
CHAPTER 3
Table 1: Continued
33 Lops et al.91
34 Ormianer117
35a Ravald et al.118
35b
36 Ostman et al.88 37a Arnhart et al.85
37b
38 Lai et al.119
39 Levine et al.120
40a Rodrigo et al.121
40b
41a Roccuzzo et al.122 41b
41c
P
R P
P R
R P P
P
13.2 121 257 92.3 207 (10-21)
10 46 173 99.4 172
1: TiOblast 13.5 66 184 95.0 136 (12-15)
2: Machined 13.5 66 187 94.7 116 (12-15)
10 46 121 99.2 106
1: TiUnite 6.7 47 136 98.5 136 (5.3-9.8)
2: Machined 8.2 52 96.2 52 (5.3-9.8)
10 168 231 98.3 231
5 20 21 100 21
1: immediate 5 22 34 26 placement
2: delayed 5 34 26 placement
1: periodontally 10 112 61 96.6 59 healthy
2: moderately 10 112 95 92.7 88 periodontally
compromized
3: severely 10 112 90 90.0 81 periodontally
compromized
Article number
Author
Study design
Treatment subgroups
Mean follow-up years (range)
Patients baseline
Implants baseline
Survival %
Implants for BL follow-up
40
