Page 40 - Peri-implant health: the effect of implant design and surgical procedure on bone and soft tissue stability
P. 40
CHAPTER 3
Table 1: Continued
14 Derks et al.83 R
15a Sanchez-Siles et R al.104
15b
16 Donati et al.77 P 17a Canullo et al.84 P
17b
18 Vandeweghe et al.9 R
19 Nedir et al.110 P
20 van Velzen et al.97 P
21 Trullenque-Eriksson R
& Guisado-Moya111
22 Meijer et al.93 P
23 Schropp et al.112 P
24 Mangano et al.113 R
25 Simion et al.114 R
26 Meyle et al.94 P
27 Anitua et al.115 R
28 Donati et al.77 P
29 Gelb et al.116 R
30 Chappuis et al.14 R
31a Renvert et al.80 R 31b
32 Frisch et al.95 R
8.9 596 2367 97.0 1578 1: smooth neck 6.44 171 515 100 515
2: whitout 5.61 229 729 100 729 smooth neck
12 40 45 97.0 35
1: steam 5 15 15 100 15 cleaning
abutment
2: Plasma of 5 15 15 100 15 Argon cleaning
abutment
14.3 33 203 97.0 197 (10-21)
10 17 25 100 23
10 250 506 99.7 367
13.19 105 342 90.6 342 (8.46-24.37)
10 150 240 95.3 240
10 63 63 47
15.2 49 178 97.2 178 (10-20)
12 29 59 93.2 59
10 20 54 96.3 54
10.3 75 111 98.9 87 (7.2-11.4)
5 151 161 95.6 140
7.33 57 107 100 107 (7-8)
20 67 95 89.5 85
1: TiOblast 13 27 132 80 2: TiUnite 13 27 102 84
14.1 22 89 98.9 89 (10.2-18.9)
Article number
Author
Treatment subgroups
Mean follow-up years (range)
Patients baseline
Implants baseline
Survival %
Implants for BL follow-up
38
Study design
