Page 38 - Peri-implant health: the effect of implant design and surgical procedure on bone and soft tissue stability

CHAPTER 3
Table 1: The number of papers and summarized relevant clinical information.
Article number
Author
Study design
Treatment subgroups
Mean follow-up years (range)
Patients baseline
Implants baseline
Survival %
Implants for BL follow-up
1 Shi et al.98 R
2a Sener-Yamaner P et al.90
2b
3 Galindo-Moreno P et al.105
4a den Hartog et al.86 P 4b
4c
5 Froum & Khouly87 R 6a Ayna et al.106 P
6b
7a Taschieri et al.107 R
7b
7c
7d
8 Cassetta et al.89 P
9 Ekfeldt et al.92 R
10 Jensen et al.96 R
11 Tey et al.78 R
12 Cosyn et al.108 P
13 Glibert et al.109 P
10.1 67 98 96.6 95 (8-14.6)
1: early loaded 6.8 55 107 99.0 106 SLA
2: early loaded 6.8 68 97.0 66 SLA-active
5 69 97 95.9 93
1: smooth neck 5 31 31 96.2 26
2: rough neck 5 31 31 100 28
3: scalloped 5 31 31 96.2 26 rough neck
8.5 52 52 100 28
1: all-on 4 7 16 64 100 60 mandible metal
ceramic
2: all-on 4 7 16 64 100 64 mandible bar
retained
1a: P-PRP 5 71 30 97.5 11 Immediat
Loading
1b: P-PRP 5 49 28 Delayed
loading
2a: non P-PRP 5 38 11 97.9 9 immediat
loading
2b: non P-PRP 5 37 10 delayed loading
36
5 270
10.5 23 (10-11)
8 (3-16) 26
5.9 194
5 22
6.2 40 (5.4-6.9)
576 94.1 542 30 100 30
52 91.7 43
266 100 266
22 95.0 17 112 99.1 111