Page 160 - Shared Guideline Development Experiences in Fertility Care
P. 160
Chapter 7
References
1. Weisz G, Cambrosio A, Keating P et al. e emergence of clinical practice guidelines. Milbank Q 2007;85:691–727.
2. Institute of Medicine (IOM). Crossing the quality Chasm. A new Health System for the 21st century. Washington D.C.: National Academy Press, 2001.
3. Grimshaw J, omas R, MacLennan G et al. E ectiveness and e ciency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies. Health Technol Assess 2004;8:1–72.
4. Grol R, Wensing M, Eccles M. Improving Patient care. e implementation of change in clinical practice. Oxford, UK: Elsevier Butterworth Heinemann, 2005.
5. Burgers JS, Cluzeau FA, Hanna SE et al. Characteristics of high-quality guidelines: evaluation of 86 clinical guidelines developed in ten European countries and Canada. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2003;19:148–157.
6. Grilli R, Magrini N, Penna A et al. Practice guidelines developed by specialty societies; the need for a critical appraisal. Lancet 2000;355:103–106.
7. Alonso-Coello P, Irfan A, Sola I et al. e quality of clinical practice guidelines over the last two decades: a systematic review of guideline appraisal studies. Qual Saf Health Care 2010;19:e58.
8. Kung J, Miller RR, Mackowiak PA. Failure of clinical practice guidelines to meet institute of medicine standards: two more decades of little, if any, progress. Arch Intern Med 2012;172:1628–1633.
9. Shaneyfelt TM, Centor RM. Reassessment of clinical practice guidelines: go gently into that good night. J Am Med Assoc 2009;301:868–869.
10. Terrace, L. Development and validation of an international appraisal instrument for assessing the quality of clinical practice guidelines: the AGREE project. Qual Saf Health Care 2003;12:18-23.
11. Burgers JS, Fervers B, Haugh M et al. International assessment of the quality of clinical practice guidelines in oncology using the Appraisal of Guidelines and Research and Evaluation Instrument. J Clin Oncol 2004;22:2000-2007.
12. National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE). e guidelines’ manual. London: NICE, 2009. URL: www.nice.org.uk Archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/65UXx2saM
13. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN). SIGN 50: A guidelines’ developer handbook. Edinburgh: SIGN, 2008. URL: http://www.sign.ac.uk/pdf/sign50.pdf Archived by WebCite® at http:// www.webcitation.org/65UY1tSVw
14. Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation (AGREE) Next Steps Consortium. AGREE II Instrument, 2009. www.agreetrust.org.
15. Werkgroep richtlijnen voor richtlijnen. Richtlijn voor richtlijnen. Den Haag: Regieraad Kwaliteit van Zorg, 2012.
16. Medisch Specialistische richtlijnen 2.0.: http://www.kwaliteitskoepel.nl/assets/structured- les/2012/ Eindrapport_adviescommissie_richtlijnen_okt20111.pdf.
17. Grol, R. Personal paper. Beliefs and evidence in changing clinical practice. BMJ 1997; 315:418.
18. Bero LA, Grilli R, Grimshaw JM et al. Getting research ndings into practice: Closing the gap between research and practice: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions to promote the implementation of research ndings. BMJ 1998;317:465.
19. Grol, R., Grimshaw, J. From best evidence to best practice: e ective implementation of change in patients’ care. Lancet 2003;362:1225-30.
20. Nelen WLDM, Hermens RPMG, Mourad SM et al. Monitoring reproductive health in Europe: what are the best indicators of reproductive health? A need for evidence-based quality indicators of reproductive health care. Human Reprod 2007; 22:916-918.
21. Alston CPL, Halvorson G, Paget L et al. Communicating With Patients on Health Care Evidence, Discussion Paper. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine, 2012 [http://www.iom.edu/evidence].
22. Halvorson GC. Health Care Reform Now!: A Prescription for Change. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2007.
23. Landon BE, Grumbach K, Wallace PJ. Integrating public health and primary care systems: potential strategies from an IOM report. J Am Med Assoc 2012;308:461–462.
158
