Page 34 - Demo
P. 34
Chapter 132Normalisation Process Theory and to get insight in implementation action, interventions, and strategies used to fuel these implementation processes. The third objective was to evaluate the added value of collaboration in a Community of Practice for exchanging knowledge and designing implementation plans to embed the Needs Assessment Framework in intellectual disability care organisations. The fourth objective was to follow the process of implementing the MDET method in care organisations, to evaluate adaptations made by organisations to tailor the method to their organisational structure and to test effectiveness of the adapted method. The final objective was to test the effectiveness of the method %u201cWith other eyes%u201d on the quality of care for people with intellectual disabilities and to evaluate the normalisation of this method within participating care teams. During the research period for these studies (2019-2024) the CoVID-19 pandemic hit the world. Intellectual disability care organisations in the Netherlands were forced to minimise infection risk for vulnerable clients. Although all studies were affected by the pandemic, the study into the %u2018With other eyes%u2019 method was postponed, because the important observation part could not be conducted safely. In an extra study, the objective was to test whether the introduction of the CCA on January 1st, 2020 and full implementation of the CCA one year later impacted recordings of involuntary care for people with intellectual disabilities and challenging behaviour. Therefore, in Chapter 2, this dissertation starts with the context of the changing legislation in the Netherlands around restrictive measures and involuntary care. The differences between the old Special Admission Act (BOPZ, 1994) and the new CCA (Staatsblad, 2018), and the impact of the introduction and full implementation of the CCA on the number of involuntary care recordings for clients with challenging behaviour are described. Chapter 3 provides insight into care professionals%u2019 implementation experiences in intellectual disability care organisations. These insights were gained from the collaborative efforts of care professionals and expertsby-experience who shared tacit and experiential knowledge within two Communities of Practice. These communities were initiated with the specific aim of working together on implementing methods that reduce involuntary