Page 197 - Emotions through the eyes of our closest living relatives- Exploring attentional and behavioral mechanisms

Appendix to results
Table S4.1. Individual and overall reaction time means and standard deviations per condition in Experiment 1
Appendices
Individuals
Besede Kumbuka Monyama Yahimba
Familiar
Unfamiliar
Congruent
M (SD)
699.73 (95.78) 534.77 (64.87) 460.44 (75.00) 431.61 (66.60)
Incongruent
M (SD)
702.63 (101.11) 535.84 (69.44) 449.59 (71.63) 421.19 (62.18)
Congruent
M (SD)
697.43 (88.19) 518.17 (75.58) 456.89 (76.93) 422.49 (66.89)
t
9.62 -.80 .06 2.04
Incongruent
M (SD)
714.96 (87.84) 532.12 (68.29) 473.03 (58.25) 423.12 (71.12)
p
.001*** .426 .952 .042*
Table S4.2. Model output from Experiment 1.
Predictors
(Intercept)
Congruency (congruent) Familiarity (familiar) Congruency* Familiarity Random effects Session*ID (intercept) ID (intercept)
Residual
b SE
532.16 55.31 -1.47 1.85 -.11 1.85 3.77 1.85
Variance SD
264.2 16.25 12090.4 109.95 5597.4 74.82
Number of observations: 1648, Session*ID: 8, ID:4. Note that by sum coding, the levels of all factors have been mean centred. As such, the intercept reflects the grand mean of all predictors.
A 195