Page 87 - Demo

Attractiveness modulates attention854Table 2. Model Output for the Simple Model of Experiment 2. Note: all categorical independent variables were sum-to-zero coded. Parameter Median estimate SD89% CIlower bound89% CIupper boundIntercept 0.44 2.15 -2.98 3.93Condition [asymmetrized-original] 0.76 1.20 -1.19 2.67Condition [symmetrized-original] -1.67 1.21 -3.62 0.23Probe Location [most symmetrical] 0.28 0.87 -1.10 1.66Condition [asymmetrized-original]:Probe Location [most symmetrical]-0.79 1.21 -2.70 1.17Condition [symmetrized-original]:Probe Location [most symmetrical]0.25 1.19 -1.65 2.14Random effectssd [intercept] Trial order 15.51 1.78 12.99 18.63sd [intercept] Subject 0.59 0.53 0.06 1.67sd [by-subject slope] Condition [asymmetrized-original] 2.34 1.74 0.22 5.60sd [by-subject slope] Condition [symmetrized-original] 1.98 1.58 0.21 5.16sd [by-subject slope] Probe Location [most symmetrical] 1.68 1.28 0.18 4.17sd [by-subject slope] Condition [asymmetrizedoriginal]:Probe Location [most symmetrical]2.26 1.75 0.23 5.69sd [by-subject slope] Condition [symmetrizedoriginal]:Probe Location [most symmetrical]2.69 1.88 0.27 6.12Nobs = 7789Nsubj= 138Figure 4. By-Subject Mean-Centered RTs per Condition and per Probe Location. Dots indicate the median reaction time (RT), while error bars represent the 89% credible interval. As can be seen, symmetry did not substantially affect reaction time in any of the three conditions.Tom Roth.indd 85 08-01-2024 10:41