Page 285 - Demo

Bibliography283BWatson, K. K., Ghodasra, J. H., Furlong, M. A., & Platt, M. L. (2012). Visual preferences for sex and status in female rhesus macaques. Animal Cognition, 15(3), 401–407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-011-0467-5Waynforth, D. (2007). Mate choice copying in humans. Human Nature, 18(3), 264–271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-007-9004-2Weafer, J., & Fillmore, M. T. (2013). Acute alcohol effects on attentional bias in heavy and moderate drinkers. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 27, 32–41. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028991Weierich, M. R., Treat, T. A., & Hollingworth, A. (2008). Theories and measurement of visual attentional processing in anxiety. Cognition & Emotion, 22(6), 985–1018. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930701597601Weingrill, T., Willems, E. P., Zimmermann, N., Steinmetz, H., & Heistermann, M. (2011). Species-specific patterns in fecal glucocorticoid and androgen levels in zoo-living orangutans (Pongo spp.). General and Comparative Endocrinology, 172(3), 446–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygcen.2011.04.008Werheid, K., Schacht, A., & Sommer, W. (2007). Facial attractiveness modulates early and late eventrelated brain potentials. Biological Psychology, 76(1–2), 100–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2007.06.008Wheatley, J. R., Apicella, C. A., Burriss, R. P., Cárdenas, R. A., Bailey, D. H., Welling, L. L. M., & Puts, D. A. (2014). Women’s faces and voices are cues to reproductive potential in industrial and forager societies. Evolution and Human Behavior, 35(4), 264–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2014.02.006Whelan, R. (2008). Effective analysis of reaction time data. The Psychological Record, 58(3), 475–482. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395630White, T. L., & Cunningham, C. (2017). Sexual preference and the self-reported role of olfaction in mate selection. Chemosensory Perception, 10(1), 31–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12078-017-9223-9Wickham, L. H. V., & Morris, P. E. (2003). Attractiveness, distinctiveness, and recognition of faces: Attractive faces can be typical or distinctive but are not better recognized. The American Journal of Psychology, 116(3), 455–468. https://doi.org/10.2307/1423503Wiese, H., Altmann, C. S., & Schweinberger, S. R. (2014). Effects of attractiveness on face memory separated from distinctiveness: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Neuropsychologia, 56, 26–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.12.023Williams, S. E., & Hoffman, E. A. (2009). Minimizing genetic adaptation in captive breeding programs: A review. Biological Conservation, 142(11), 2388–2400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2009.05.034Wilson, D. A., & Tomonaga, M. (2018). Exploring attentional bias towards threatening faces in chimpanzees using the dot probe task. PLoS ONE, 13(11), e0207378. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207378Winters, S., Dubuc, C., & Higham, J. P. (2015). Perspectives: The looking time experimental paradigm in studies of animal visual perception and cognition. Ethology, 121(7), 625–640. https://doi.org/10.1111/eth.12378Wu, K., Chen, C., & Yu, Z. (2022). Handsome or rugged? Human Nature, 33(4), 380–399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-022-09434-yYang, T., Chen, H., Hu, Y., Zheng, Y., & Wang, W. (2015). Preferences for sexual dimorphism on attractiveness levels: An eye-tracking study. Personality and Individual Differences, 77, 179–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.12.005Zanoli, A., Gamba, M., Lemasson, A., Norscia, I., & Palagi, E. (2022). Inter-sexual multimodal communication during mating in wild geladas: The leading role of females. Current Zoology, 68(5), 570–580. https://doi.org/10.1093/cz/zoab093Zeevi, L., Klein Selle, N., Kellmann, E. L., Boiman, G., Hart, Y., & Atzil, S. (2022). Bio-behavioral synchrony is a potential mechanism for mate selection in humans. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 4786. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-08582-6Zhan, J., Liu, M., Garrod, O. G. B., Daube, C., Ince, R. A. A., Jack, R. E., & Schyns, P. G. (2021). Modeling individual preferences reveals that face beauty is not universally perceived across cultures. Current Biology, 31(10), 2243-2252.e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2021.03.013Zhang, Q., Maner, J. K., Xu, Y., & Zheng, Y. (2017). Relational motives reduce attentional adhesion to attractive alternatives in heterosexual university students in China. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46(2), 503–511. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-016-0759-6Zhang, Y., Kong, F., Chen, H., Jackson, T., Han, L., Meng, J., Yang, Z., Gao, J., & Hasan, A. N. ul. (2011). Identifying cognitive preferences for attractive female faces: An event-related potential experiment using a studytest paradigm. Journal of Neuroscience Research, 89(11), 1887–1893. https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.22724Tom Roth.indd 283 08-01-2024 10:42