Page 250 - Demo

248List of publicationsList of publicationsPublished workSamara, I*., Roth, T. S., Perea Garcia, J. O., & Kret, M. E. (in press). Individual mate preferences differentially modulate immediate and voluntaryattention. Scientific Reports.Samara, I., Roth, T. S., Nikolić, M., Prochazkova, E., & Kret, M. E.(2022). Can third-party observers detect attraction in others based on subtlenonverbal cues? Current Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-02927-0Roth, T. S., Samara, I., Tan, J., Prochazkova, E., & Kret, M. E.(2021). A comparative framework of inter-individual coordination andpair-bonding. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 39, 98-105.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2021.03.005Samara, I.*, Roth, T. S. & Kret, M. E. The role of emotion projection, sexual desire, and self-rated attractiveness in the sexual overperception bias. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 50, 2507–2516 (2021).https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-021-02017-5Roth, T. S., Samara, I., & Kret, M. E. (2021). Multimodal mate choice:Exploring the effects of sight, sound, and scent on partner choice in aspeed-date paradigm. Evolution and Human Behavior, 42(5), 461-468.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2021.04.004Roth T. S., Du X., Samara, I., & Kret M.E. (2021). Attractiveness modulates attention, but does not enhance gaze cueing. Evolutionary BehavioralSciences.Roth, T. S., Samara, I., & Kret, M. E. (2021). Ultimate andproximate factors underlying sexual overperception bias: A reply toLee et al. (2020). Evolution and Human Behavior, 42(1), 73-75.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2020.06.002Kret, M. E., Venneker, D., Evans, B., Samara, I., & Sauter, D. (2021).The ontogeny of human laughter. Biology Letters, 17 (9), 20210319.https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2021.0319Wang, B., Samara, I., & Theeuwes, J. (2019). Statistical regularities biasovert attention. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 81, 1813-1821.https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-019-01708-5Iliana Samara 17x24.indd 248 08-04-2024 16:38