Page 189 - Demo

187AppendicesATable S4. Model table for the Bayesian mixed model that predicts RTfrom Pre-date attractiveness rating and Gender.RTPredictors Estimates CI (95%)Intercept 0.52 -1.18 – 2.22Gender[Female] 0.34 -1.37 – 2.05AttractivenessDistractor 1.44 0.18 – 2.69AttractivenessProbe -1.09 -2.51 – 0.29Gender[Female]: AttractivenessDistractor -0.41 -1.68 – 0.86Gender[Female]: AttractivenessProbe 1.40 -0.02 – 2.82Random Effectsσ2 2588.90τ00Subject 0.97τ11Subject:AttractivenessDistractor 7.60τ11Subject:AttractivenessP robe 13.47NSubject 57Observations 4831Notes: Gender was sum-coded, while Pre-date attractiveness ratings werecentered around 4 (the middle option).Table S5. Model table for the Bayesian mixed model that predicts RTfrom Post-date attractiveness ratings and Gender.RTPredictors Estimates CI (95%)Intercept 0.36 -1.42 – 2.14Gender[Female] -0.24 -2.06 – 1.64AttractivenessDistractor 1.89 0.66 – 3.11AttractivenessProbe -0.89 -2.44 – 0.63Gender[Female]: AttractivenessDistractor 0.34 -0.89 – 1.59Gender[Female]: AttractivenessProbe 1.16 -0.41 – 2.71Random Effectsσ2 2580.38τ00Subject 1.29τ11Subject:AttractivenessDistractor 1.92τ11Subject:AttractivenessP robe 13.50NSubject 56Observations 3251Notes: Gender was sum-coded, while Post-date attractiveness ratings werecentered around 4 (the middle option).).Table S6. Total number of trials per level of the predictors per Gender.Female (N = 24) Male (N = 32)Date outcome probe0 (= no interest) 987 10561 (= interest) 377 831Date outcome distractor0 985 10631 379 824Table S7. Average RTs and SD (between brackets) per level of Date out,come of the probe picture and Gender.0 1female 365.36 (68.81) 384.14 (82.51)male 342.76 (66.9) 342.16 (62.73)Table S8. Average RTs and SD (between brackets) per level of Date out,come of the distractor picture and Gender.0 1female 364.71 (65.78) 385.75 (88.28)male 340.02 (67.32) 345.69 (61.96)Table S9. Model table for the Bayesian mixed model that predicts RTfrom Date outcome and Gender.RTPredictors Estimates CI (95%)Intercept 0.82 -1.14 – 2.824Gender[Female] 0.97 -1.08 – 2.99DateAgainProbe[yes] -0.81 -3.16 – 1.45DateAgainDistractor[yes] 2.20 0.22 – 4.24Gender[Female]:DateAgainProbe[yes] 2.31 0.00 – 4.66Gender[Female]:DateAgainDistractor[yes] 0.62 -1.42 – 2.67Random Effectsσ2 2588.97τ00Subject 1.60τ11Subject:DateAgainP robe[yes] 26.92τ11Subject:DateAgainDistractor[yes] 4.71NSubject 56Observations 3251Notes: All predictors were sum-coded.Table S10. Total number of trials per level of the predictors per Gender.Female (N = 17) Male (N = 18)Pre-date attractiveness left1 74 742 216 1583 164 1954 180 1975 84 1046 44 517 0 28Pre-date attractiveness right1 79 392 139 943 196 1814 180 2175 104 1666 64 937 0 17Table S11. Average Bias score (proportion of time looking at left picture)and SD (between brackets) per level of Pre-date attractiveness rating of theleft picture and Gender.1234567Female 0.3 (0.27) 0.39 (0.26) 0.48 (0.27) 0.52 (0.29) 0.57 (0.28) 0.68 (0.21)Male 0.36 (0.24) 0.37 (0.2) 0.4 (0.26) 0.42 (0.27) 0.59 (0.31) 0.73 (0.18) 0.89 (0.16)Table S12. Average Bias score (proportion of time looking at left picture)and SD (between brackets) per level of Pre-date attractiveness rating of theright picture and Gender.1234567Female 0.3 (0.27) 0.39 (0.26) 0.48 (0.27) 0.52 (0.29) 0.57 (0.28) 0.68 (0.21)Male 0.36 (0.24) 0.37 (0.2) 0.4 (0.26) 0.42 (0.27) 0.59 (0.31) 0.73 (0.18) 0.89 (0.16)Table S11. Average Bias score (proportion of time looking at left picture)and SD (between brackets) per level of Pre-date attractiveness rating of theleft picture and Gender.1234567Female 0.3 (0.27) 0.39 (0.26) 0.48 (0.27) 0.52 (0.29) 0.57 (0.28) 0.68 (0.21)Male 0.36 (0.24) 0.37 (0.2) 0.4 (0.26) 0.42 (0.27) 0.59 (0.31) 0.73 (0.18) 0.89 (0.16)Table S12. Average Bias score (proportion of time looking at left picture)and SD (between brackets) per level of Pre-date attractiveness rating of theright picture and Gender.1234567Female 0.3 (0.27) 0.39 (0.26) 0.48 (0.27) 0.52 (0.29) 0.57 (0.28) 0.68 (0.21)Male 0.36 (0.24) 0.37 (0.2) 0.4 (0.26) 0.42 (0.27) 0.59 (0.31) 0.73 (0.18) 0.89 (0.16)Iliana Samara 17x24.indd 187 08-04-2024 16:37