Page 55 - Breeding and regulatory opportunities, Renaud
P. 55
Seed Regulation in the US
The National Organic Standards Board (NOSB), a stakeholder board comprised
of organic farmers, organic processors, environmentalists, consumers,
an organic retailer, an organic certiication agent, and a scientist with
recognized expertise in organic agriculture, has statutory powers which
provide formal procedures for public notice and comment. It was set up to
ofer recommendations to the NOP to consider regarding interpretation and
implementation of the national standard, yet their recommendations are not
binding. In 2001, the NOSB submitted recommendations (NOSB, 2001) for the
criteria and procedures that might be used for assessing organic seeds and
planting stock. It assigned responsibility for documentation of commercial
availability to certiiers (recorded through organic farm plans, as set out in
CFR Section 205.201(a)(2) and veriied by routine inspection processes). The
determination of commercial availability of organic seed was based on the
appropriate form, quality, and quantity criteria. The NOSB requested that the
Accredited Certiiers Association (ACA), the organization representing organic
certiiers in the US, develop procedures and capacity for their inspection
processes to verify the availability of organic seeds and planting stock. The
recommendations further laid out guidelines for interpretation of the organic
seed rule, of which the clear deinition of equivalency and type was identiied
as important for interpretation of the organic seed regulation:
• Equivalency is deined as a variety exhibiting the same ‘type’ (such as the
butterhead lettuce type) and similar agronomic characteristics such as
insect and disease resistance when compared to the original varietal choice.
• Type is deined by the Federal Seed Act of 1939 (7 U.S.C. 1551.) as either (A)
a group of varieties so nearly similar that the individual varieties cannot be
clearly diferentiated except under special conditions, or (B) when used with
a variety name.
Subsequently, a subcommittee of the NOSB, the Joint Crops and Compliance,
Accreditation, and Certiication Committee (JC & CAC), was formed to further
develop the recommendations. A revised version inclusive of public comment
was submitted to the NOSB in 2005. The reissued recommendations stressed
the need to ensure the consistent application of organic seed requirements
(NOSB, 2005). A number of new requirements shifted more responsibility
37