Page 124 - Demo

Chapter 5122Table 2. continued Reported outcomesFrequencyNumber of different outcome measurement instruments usedPROClinROObsROPerfOCognitive function; Communication 2 2 0 0 0 2Communication; Activity; Social behavior 2 1 2 0 0 0Depression and mood disorders; behavior 2 1 2 0 0 0Emotion regulation; Social behavior 2 1 2 0 0 0Emotion regulation; Social behavior; Eating behavior 2 1 2 0 0 0Aggression; Social behavior 1 1 1 0 0 0Anxiety; Irritability 1 1 1 0 0 0Cognitive function; Behavior 1 1 0 0 0 1Cognitive function; Communication; Social behavior 1 1 1 0 0 0Cognitive function; Emotion regulation 1 1 0 0 0 1Cognitive function; Global impression 1 1 0 1 0 0Cognitive function; Motor function; Emotion regulation 1 1 0 0 0 1Communication; Social behavior 1 1 1 0 0 0Eating behavior; Mental health 1 1 1 0 0 0Emotion regulation; Social behavior; Activity 1 1 1 0 0 0Irritability; Hyperactivity 1 1 1 0 0 0Mental health; Autism 1 1 0 1 0 0Pain; Mental health; Social behavior 1 1 0 0 1 0Pain; Stress; Social behavior 1 1 0 1 0 0Satisfaction; Mental health 1 1 1 0 0 0* Combined terms include outcomes that are measured with one instrument, consisting of a combination of several outcomes. ClinRO, clinician-reported outcome; ObsRO, observer-reported outcome; PerfO, performance outcome; PRO, patient-reported outcome.Outcome measurement instrumentsOf the 457 different outcome measurement instruments that were identified, 213 (47%) were classified as instruments for PROs, 54 (12%) as ClinROs, 48 (11%) as ObsROs, and 157 (34%) as PerfOs. There were 288 (63%) outcome measurement instruments that were used in only one clinical trial. Another 16 (4%) outcome measurement instruments were self-designed for the particular trial, classified as instrument for PROs (n=12) and ObsROs (n=4). Instruments for PerfOs measured cognitive function and physical function. Annelieke Muller sHL.indd 122 14-11-2023 09:07