Page 74 - A Study of Theological Responses to Alvin Plantinga’s Aquinas/Calvin Model of Warranted Christian Belief - Kees van Kralingen
P. 74

Chapter 4
                  
 1995: Review essay of Plantinga’s Warrant: the Current Debate  Warrant and
4.5 Appendix
Proper Function Oliphint also includes a discussion of Plantinga’s God and Other Minds                
 2001: Review essay of Plantinga’s Warranted Christian Belief Oliphint’s response        sensus divinitatis                    truth question. He includes a proposal for a modification of Plantinga’s A/C model.
 2006: Publication of Oliphint’s book Reasons for Faith                                     response to Plantinga’s concept of Free Will Defense as his view on the proble     
                   Revelation and Reason            The Irrationality of Unbelief: An Exegetical Study                    The Old-New Reformed Epistemology     response to Plantinga’s use of the SD in his Aquinas/Calvin             
 2011: Oliphint’s essay entitled Using Reason by Faith                     cusses Plantinga’s approach and his view on the SD (again with some repetition).
 2012: In a review essay on Michael Sudduth’s book The Reformed Objection to Natural Theology               gy, and this includes further comments on Plantinga’s views on these matters.
 2013: Oliphint publishes a review of Plantinga’s Where the Conflict Really Lies               not comment specifically on Plantinga’s concept of warranted Christian belief, but               and again on Plantinga’s concept of Free Will Defence.
 Oliphint, ‘Plantinga on Warrant.’
 Oliphint, ‘Epistemology and Christian Belief.’
  Reasons for Faith.
   Revelation and Reason.
 Oliphint, ‘The Irrationality of Unbelief.’
 Oliphint, ‘The OldNew Reformed Epistemology.’
 Oliphint, ‘Using Reason by Faith.’
 Oliphint, ‘Is There a Reformed Objection to Natural Theology?
 Oliphint, ‘Review of Alvin Plantinga: “Where the Conflict Really Lies.”’
72
   72   73   74   75   76