Page 72 - A Study of Theological Responses to Alvin Plantinga’s Aquinas/Calvin Model of Warranted Christian Belief - Kees van Kralingen
P. 72
Chapter 4
He says: “There can be no true and right ‘ ’ n 17:3).” As a result, apologetics “should be less concerned about the warran on presenting and arguing for the truth as it is found in Christ.”
in’s model when he says: “Or perhaps we should say that the proper functioning of the he extended A/C model is applied to us.”
Oliphint’s lack of attention for the extend
addressed in the extended A/C model. Plantinga’s work to show how the full Chri de jure
Oliphint, ‘Is There a Reformed Objection to Natural Theology?’ 202 uses the words ‘true knowledge.’ If we use Plantinga’s definition of knowledge as warranted true belief, then it is superfluous to talk about ‘true’ knowledge.
Oliphint, ‘Is There a Reformed Objection to Natural Theology?’
WCB
Oliphint, ‘Epistemology and Christian Belief,’ 179. Oliphint, ‘Epistemology and Christian Belief,’ 158. WCB
70
