Page 75 - A Study of Theological Responses to Alvin Plantinga’s Aquinas/Calvin Model of Warranted Christian Belief - Kees van Kralingen
P. 75
CHAPTER 5
Theological Responses to Plantinga’s A/C Model – Kevin Diller
Diller’s – Theology’s Epistemological Dilemma. How Karl
5.1 Introduction
Barth and Alvin Plantinga Provide a Unified Response – rily at a critical discussion of Plantinga’s work. It rather uses Plantinga’s theology’s epistemological dilemma. According to Diller, this dilemma is created by two pensable but conflicting affirmations, and can be defined as follows: “Christian .”
reliable. As Diller concludes: “We simply cannot certify the reliability of our own noetic means of those same resources.” “...an engagement of God’s self theology.” He uses Barth’s theology of revelation and Plantinga’s epistemology of
Theology’s Epistemological Dilemma. How Karl Barth and Alvin Plantinga Provide a Unified Response
Theology’s Epistemological Dilemma
Theology’s Epistemological Dilemma
Theology’s Epistemological Dilemma
Theology’s Epistemological Dilemma
73
