Page 62 - A Study of Theological Responses to Alvin Plantinga’s Aquinas/Calvin Model of Warranted Christian Belief - Kees van Kralingen
P. 62
Chapter 4
true WCB had already referred to Plantinga’s own words WCB Elsewhere Plantinga also states this is at heart a theological question: “And pute as to whether theistic belief is rational (warranted) can’t be dispute.”
Plantinga’s investigation of the de jure WCB this book: “The second project addresses Christian believers and, hence, starts from the assumption of the truth of Christian belief answer the question whether and how such belief can have warrant.” WCB as he states that “... I can only say that it does, indeed, seem to me to be true, and to be the maximally important truth.”
present that just ‘lying dormant in the discussion ’
Second, Oliphint’s objection Plantinga’s approach de jure de facto
de jure WCB de jure emphasise its rationality as Paul says to Festus (Acts 26:25) “...I am sp
WCB
Oliphint, ‘Epistemology and Christian Belief,’ 156. WCB
WCB
WCB
WCB
60
