Page 188 - Getting the Picture Modeling and Simulation in Secondary Computer Science Education

186
References
Adriaens, H., Fontein, P., Uijl, M. D., & Vos, K. D. (2016). De toekomstige arbeidsmarkt voor onderwijspersoneel po, vo en mbo 2015-2025, Update november 2016. CentERdata.
Aiken, J. M., Caballero, M. D., Douglas, S. S., Burk, J. B., Scanlon, E. M., Thoms, B. D., & Schatz, M. F. (2012). Understanding student computational thinking with computational modeling. arXiv preprint arXiv:1207.1764.
Akker, J. V. den, Gravemeijer, K., McKenney, S., & Nieveen, N. (2006). Educational design research. Taylor & Francis.
Allan, W., Coulter, B., Denner, J., Erickson, J., Lee, I., Malyn-Smith, J., & Martin, F. (2010). Computational Thinking for Youth White Paper. Walt Allan. http://itestlrc.edc.org/resources/computational-thinking- youth-white-paper
Alturki, R. A. (2016). Measuring and Improving Student Performance in an Introductory Programming Course. Informatics in Education-An International Journal, 15(2), 183–204.
Amouroux, E., Gaudou, B., Desvaux, S., & Drogoul, A. (2010). Odd: A promising but incomplete formalism for individual-based model specification. Computing and Communication Technologies, Research, Innovation, and Vision for the Future (RIVF), 2010 IEEE RIVF International Conference on, 1–4.
Angeli, C., Voogt, J., Fluck, A., Webb, M., Cox, M., Malyn-Smith, J., & Zagami, J. (2016). A K-6 computational thinking curriculum framework: Implications for teacher knowledge. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 19(3).
Bakema, G., Zwart, J. P., & Lek, H. van der. (2002). Fully Communication Oriented Information Modeling, FCO-IM. Ten Hagen & Stam.
Barendsen, E., & Bruggink, M. (2019). Het volle potentieel van de computer leren benutten: Over informatica en computational thinking. In Van Twaalf tot Achttien.
Barendsen, E., & Tolboom, J. (2016). Advisory report (intended) curriculum for informatics for upper secondary education. SLO.
Barendsen, E., & Zwaneveld, B. (2010). Informatica in het Voortgezet Onderwijs Voorstel voor vakvernieuwing [Notitie voor KNAW].
Barendsen, E., Grgurina, N., & Tolboom, J. (2016). A New Informatics Curriculum for Secondary Education in The Netherlands. International Conference on Informatics in Schools: Situation, Evolution, and Perspectives, 105–117.
Barendsen, E., Mannila, L., Demo, B., Grgurina, N., Izu, C., Mirolo, C., Sentance, S., Settle, A., & Stupurienė, G. (2015). Concepts in K-9 Computer Science Education. Proceedings of the 2015 ITiCSE on Working Group Reports, 85–116.
Basawapatna, A., Repenning, A., & Lewis, C. H. (2013). The simulation creation toolkit: An initial exploration into making programming accessible while preserving computational thinking. Proceeding of the 44th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education, 501–506.
Basu, S., Biswas, G., Sengupta, P., Dickes, A., Kinnebrew, J. S., & Clark, D. (2016). Identifying middle school students’ challenges in computational thinking-based science learning. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 11(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-016-0036-2
Basu, S., Dickes, A., Kinnebrew, J. S., Sengupta, P., & Biswas, G. (2013). CTSiM: A Computational Thinking Environment for Learning Science through Simulation and Modeling. The 5th International Conference on Computer Supported Education.
Basu, S., Dukeman, A., Kinnebrew, J., Biswas, G., & Sengupta, P. (2014). Investigating student generated computational models of science. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS 2014), 1097–1104.
Basu, S., McElhaney, K. W., Grover, S., Harris, C. J., & Biswas, G. (2018). A principled approach to designing assessments that integrate science and computational thinking. International Society of the Learning Sciences, Inc.[ISLS].
Bauer, B., Muller, J. P., & Odell, J. (2001). Agent UML: A formalism for specifying multiagent software systems. International journal of software engineering and knowledge engineering, 11(03), 207–230.