Page 159 - Demo

References157RPoti, J. M., Mendez, M. A., Ng, S. W., & Popkin, B. M. (2015). Is the degree of food processing and convenience linked with the nutritional quality of foods purchased by US households? American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 101(6), 1251–1262. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.114.100925Powell, T. E., Boomgaarden, H. G., De Swert, K., & de Vreese, C. H. (2015). A Clearer Picture: The Contribution of Visuals and Text to Framing Effects. Journal of Communication, 65(6), 997–1017.Proctor, R. (2008). Agnotology: A missing term to describe the cultural production of ignorance (and its study). In R. Proctor & L. Schiebinger (Eds.), Agnotology: The Making and Unmaking of Ignorance (pp. 1–33). Stanford University Press.Rabello, E. T., Gommeh, E., Benedetti, A., Valerio-Ureña, G., & Metze, T. (2021). Mapping online visuals of shale gas controversy: a digital methods approach. Information, Communication & Society. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.1934064Rabello, E. T., & Gouveia, F. C. (2019). Métodos digitais nos estudos em saúde: Mapeando usos e propondo sentidos. In J. J. Omena (Ed.), Métodos digitais: Teoria-prática-crítica (1st ed., pp. 143–160). Instituto de Comunicação da Nova.Redden, J. (2011). Poverty in the news: A framing analysis of coverage in Canada and the UK. Information, Communication & Society, 14(6), 820–849. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2011.586432Reforma. (2018, October 6). Descarta AMLO fracking. https://www.elfinanciero.com.mx/economia/sin-frackingmexico-dejaria-de-aprovechar-casi-el-50-por-ciento-de-sus-reservas-cnh/Richter, D. H. (1998). Saussure, Ferdinand. “Nature of the Linguistic Sign.” In D. H. Richter (Ed.), The Critical Tradition: Classic Texts and Contemporary Trends (pp. 832–835). Bedford/St. Martin’s Press.Rip, A. (1986). controversies as informal Technology Assessment. Knowledge: Creation, DiffusIOn, Utilization, 8(2), 349–371.Rodriguez, L., & Asoro, R. L. (2012). Visual Representations of Genetic Engineering and Genetically Modified Organisms in the Online Media. Visual Communication Quarterly, 19(4), 232–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/15551393.2012.735585Rodriguez, L., & Dimitrova, D. V. (2011). The levels of visual framing. Journal of Visual Literacy, 30(1), 48–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/23796529.2011.11674684Rogers, R. (2013). Digital Methods. MIT Press.Rogers, R. (2015). Digital Methods for Web Research. Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118900772.etrds0076Rogers, R. (2017). 5. Foundations of Digital Methods: Query Design. In M. T. Schäfer & K. van Es (Eds.), Studying Culture through Data (pp. 75–94). Amsterdam University Press. https://doi.org/doi:10.1515/9789048531011-008Rogers, R. (2019). Doing digital methods. Sage Publications.Rogers, R. (2021). Visual media analysis for Instagram and other online platforms. Big Data and Society, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517211022370Rogers, R., & Marres, N. (2000). Landscaping climate change: A mapping technique for understanding science and technology debates on the world wide web. Public Understanding of Science, 9(2), 141–163. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/9/2/304Rojas-Padilla, E., Metze, T., & Termeer, K. (2022). Seeing the Visual: A Literature Review on Why and How Policy Scholars Would Do Well to Study Influential Visualizations. Policy Studies Yearbook, 12(1), 103–136. https://doi.org/10.18278/psy.12.1.5Rommetveit, K., & Wynne, B. (2017). Technoscience, imagined publics and public imaginations. Public Understanding of Science, 26(2), 133–147. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662516663057Rosanvallon, P. (2008). Counter-Democracy, Politics in an Age of Distrust. Cambridge University Press.Rose, G. (2001). Visual Methodologies. Sage Publications.Rose, G. (2016). Visual Methodologies: An Introduction to Researching with Visual Materials (4th ed.). Sage Publications.Rousseau, S. (2012). Food and Social Media: You Are What You Tweet. AltaMira Press.Sarge, M. A., Vandyke, M. S., King, A. J., & White, S. R. (2015). Selective perceptions of hydraulic fracturing: The role of issue support in the evaluation of visual frames. Politics and the Life Sciences, 34(1), 57–72. https://doi.org/10.1017/pls.2015.6Efrat.indd 157 19-09-2023 09:47