Page 153 - Demo
P. 153
References151RDe Cock, L., Dessein, J., & de Krom, M. P. (2016). Understanding the development of organic agriculture in Flanders (Belgium): A discourse analytical approach. NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 79, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.njas.2016.04.002de Solier, I. (2018). Tasting the Digital: New Food Media. In K. LeBesco & P. Naccarato (Eds.), The Bloomsbury Handbook of Food and Popular Culture (pp. 54–65). Bloomsbury Publishing.De Wit, M. J. (2011). The great shale debate in the Karoo. South African Journal of Science, 107(7–8), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajs.v107i7/8.791Devine-Wright, H. (2011). Envisioning public engagement with renewable energy: An empirical analysis of images within the UK national press 2006/2007. In P. Devine-Wright (Ed.), Renewable Energy and the Public: From NIMBY to Participation (pp. 101–113). Earthscan.Dewulf, A., Craps, M., Bouwen, R., Taillieu, T., & Pahl-Wostl, C. (2005). Integrated management of natural resources: dealing with ambiguous issues, multiple actors and diverging frames. Water Science & Technology, 52(6), 115-124.Dodge, J. (2015). The deliberative potential of civil society organizations: framing hydraulic fracturing in New York. Policy Studies, 36(3), 249–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2015.1065967Dodge, J., & Lee, J. (2017). Framing Dynamics and Political Gridlock: The Curious Case of Hydraulic Fracturing in New York. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 19(1), 14–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2015.1116378Dodge, J., & Metze, T. (2017). Hydraulic fracturing as an interpretive policy problem: lessons on energy controversies in Europe and the U.S.A. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 19(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2016.1277947Doerr, N. (2017). Bridging language barriers, bonding against immigrants: A visual case study of transnational network publics created by far-right activists in Europe. Discourse and Society, 28(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926516676689Doerr, N., Mattoni, A., & Teune, S. (2015). Visuals in Social Movements. In D. Della Porta & M. Diani (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of Social Movements. (pp. 557-566). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199678402.013.48Doerr, N., & Milman, N. (2014). Working with images. In D. Della Porta (Ed.), Methodological Practices in Social Movement Research. (pp. 418-445). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198719571.001.0001Domke, D., Perlmutter, D., & Spratt, M. (2002). The primes of our times? Journalism: Theory, Practice & Criticism, 3(2), 131–159. https://doi.org/10.1177/146488490200300211Downs, A. (1972). Up and down with ecology: The issue-attention cycle. The public, 28, 38-50.Doyle, J. (2014). Picturing the Clima(c)tic: Greenpeace and the Representational Politics of Climate Change Communication. In B. Schneider & T. Nocke (Eds.), Image Politics of Climate Change: Visualizations, Imaginations, Documentations. (pp. 225–247). Transcript Verlag.Durnová, A. P., & Hejzlarová, E. M. (2022). Navigating the role of emotions in expertise: public framing of expertise in the Czech public controversy on birth care. Policy Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-022-09471-5EIA. (2011). Annual Energy Outlook 2011 (Vol. 2011, Issue April).Eicher-miller, H. A., Fulgoni, V. L., & Keast, D. R. (2012). Contributions of Processed Foods to Dietary Intake in the US from 2003 – 2008. Journal of Nutrition, 142, 2065S-2072S. https://doi.org/10.3945/jn.112.164442.forEl Universal. (2018, August 4). Piden a AMLO cancelar proyecto hidráulico en NL. https://horacero.com.mx/nacional/piden-a-amlo-cancelar-proyecto-hidraulico-en-nl/Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58.Feindt, P. H., & Oels, A. (2005). Does discourse matter? Discourse analysis in environmental policy making. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 7(3), 161–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/15239080500339638Finglas, P. M., Yada, R. Y., & Toldrá, F. (2014). Nanotechnology in foods: Science behind and future perspectives. Trends in Food Science and Technology, 40(2), 125–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2014.11.001Finkeldey, J. (2018). Unconventionally contentious: Frack Free South Africa’s challenge to the oil and gas industry. Extractive Industries and Society, 5(4), 461–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2018.08.006Fiolet, T., Srour, B., Sellem, L., Kesse-Guyot, E., Allès, B., Méjean, C., Deschasaux, M., Fassier, P., Latino-Martel, P., Beslay, M., Hercberg, S., Lavalette, C., Monteiro, C. A., Julia, C., & Touvier, M. (2018). Consumption of ultra-processed Efrat.indd 151 19-09-2023 09:47