Page 70 - Demo

Chapter 368Data AnalysisAll meetings were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Transcripts were uploaded in ATLAS.ti Windows (Version 22.0.6.0). A thematic analysis was conducted (Braun & Clarke, 2006). The first author re-read the transcripts several times before starting inductive coding. Significant lines were coded descriptively, resulting in 116 initial codes, and 7 code groups. The code groups were discussed with the second author to gain insight in the underlying story which could represent significant themes concerning implementation. Hereafter, the third author read the transcripts and reviewed codes and code groups, which led to suggestions for adding, merging, and deleting codes and code groups. After discussing these changes, the first and third author reviewed the transcripts with the new codes for a second and third time until consensus was reached on 69 codes and 13 code groups. The code groups were then renamed and reorganised to 6 themes and 9 subthemes (Results, Table 2). Overall conclusions and implications were discussed by the first author with the other authors. Quotes were originally in Dutch. The first author translated these to English, and checked these translations at Deepl.com. Positionality and reflexivity The first author has been working as behavioural consultant (in Dutch: orthopedagoog) in care for people with intellectual disabilities for twenty years. She is specialised in treatment of clients with challenging behaviour who faced multiple forms of restrictive measures. She was involved in the implementation of a Dutch treatment-model (Triple-C; Tournier et al., 2020) including training activities, and advising support staff and colleagues. These experiences allowed her to easily recognise the topics discussed in the CoP, which was an advantage to quickly empathise with the participants%u2019 experiences. To counter bias and maintain objectivity, meetings of the CoP were prepared for and attended by at least one other researcher with limited experience in implementation in care for people with intellectual disabilities. In addition, data were analysed with the third author, who had no experience with implementation. Also, the results were discussed with the second author who attended the meetings of CoP-1.