Page 69 - Demo

Insights from knowledge exchange in Communities of Practice673The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam VCWE2019-090R1. All participants received detailed written information about the study, including the possibility to leave the study at any time. They also signed a consent form before taking part in the study.Design and Data CollectionA Participatory Health Research design (ICPHR, 2013) was conducted within the CoP. The first and second meeting of CoP-1 were onsite, the meeting of CoP-2 was online due to Covid-19. In the first meetings of CoP-1 researchers organised discussions with the aim of retrieving tacit knowledge, previous experiences, and perceptions regarding implementation processes. Participants were invited to provide examples of successful and less successful implementation. In CoP-2 only the first meeting had this focus. Other meetings focused on discussing implementation determinants and strategies. Therefore, for the current study, data collected in the first and second meeting of CoP-1 and the first meeting of CoP-2 were analysed. Table 1 gives an overview of participants and topics. Table 1 Overview of participants and topicsCommunity of Practice 1Meeting 1 June 2019 (Onsite)Care professionals (n = 9) of various care organisations (N = 6)Experts-by-experience (n = 3)Researchers (n = 5) *In three subgroups participants discussed prior implementation experiences (meeting 1C, 1S, 1B). Meeting 2September 2019(Onsite)Care professionals (n = 7) of various care organisations (N = 6)Experts-by-experience (n = 3)Researchers (n = 4) *Participants of three organisations presented prior experiences with implementation and answered questions (meeting 2P).Information about implementation interventions was shared with participants. Participants explored prior experiences with implementation interventions and discussed their experiences (meeting 2D).Community of Practice 2Meeting 1October 2021(Online)Care professionals (n = 7) of various care organisations (N = 4)Researchers (n = 3) *Participants discussed prior implementation experiences (meeting 1W).*students (n = 1-3) were also present to observe