Page 44 - Like me, or else... - Michelle Achterberg

Chapter 2
significant (d=0.09, 95% CI: -0.19-0.36, p=.539). The study outcomes were homogeneous; there was no heterogeneity in the results.
Figure 4. a) visual representation of the ROIs: i) amygdala, ii) anterior insula and iii) medial PFC/ACC gyrus. b) Amygdala activation across the different social feedback conditions for the pilot, test, and replication sample. c) Anterior insula activation across the different social feedback conditions for the pilot, test, and replication sample. d) Medial PFC/ ACC gyrus activation across the different social feedback conditions for the pilot, test, and replication sample. *significant difference for sample with matching color. ˟significant combined effect size in the meta-analysis. Error bars indicate standard error of mean.
Brain-behavior correlations
Finally, we tested for brain-behavior correlations. Specifically, we correlated the meta-analytically significant brain results with noise blast duration. There were no significant results for negative>positive amygdala activation and aggressive behavior; nor for negative>neutral insula activation and aggression; nor for negative > neutral mPFC activation and aggression. Thus, we did not found
42