Page 136 - A Study of Theological Responses to Alvin Plantinga’s Aquinas/Calvin Model of Warranted Christian Belief - Kees van Kralingen
P. 136
Chapter 8
WCB de jure de jure de facto
of Moore’s article is that his Plantinga’s A/C model is similar to Oliphint’s response regarding the
processes in Plantinga’s work and especially in his Warrant cognitive faculty WCB cognitive process Dole’s concern, however, is that beliefs formed by cognitive processes may satisfy Plantinga already noted Dole’s WCB The deepest motivation behind Dole’s response seems t remedy this potential problem. What is Dole’s argument for his proposal?
WCB
Andrew Dole, ‘Cognitive Faculties, Cognitive Processes, and the Holy Spirit in Plantinga’s Warrant Series,’ Faith and Philosophy
Dole refers to several statements to this effect by Plantinga. See: Plantinga, ‘Respondeo,’ in: Warrant in Contemporary Epistemology; Essays in Honor of Plantinga’s Theory of Knowledge WCD WCB
Epistemology as Theology. An Evaluation of Alvin Plantinga’s Religious Epistemology WCB
134
8.2 Dole18
