Page 138 - A Study of Theological Responses to Alvin Plantinga’s Aquinas/Calvin Model of Warranted Christian Belief - Kees van Kralingen
P. 138
Chapter 8
“it would have to exhibit the relevant features as well as satisfy the core criterion.” faculties other than those set out in Plantinga’s general requirements for warrant.
This alternative approach involves “a readjustment of the central paradigm of using another essay by Plantinga on ‘Divine Knowledge ’ who knew how to do this. This does not apply to God’s knowledge. As he states: “An important difference between God and us is that our knowledge oses knowledge on the part of someone else; his does not.” concludes that “God’s beliefs don’t have to satisfy any criteria to count as items of imaginable defects in the area of credentials.” He states that God’s knowledge is the dependent on God’s knowledge, and has its credentials in so far as the criteria
items of God’s own knowledge, but they will be more quoting Dole’s conclusion in full as it gives rise to several comments regarding Plantinga’s
Theology’s Epistemological Dilemma: How Karl Barth and Alvin Plantinga Provide a Unified Response
Plantinga, ‘Divine Knowledge,’ Christian Perspectives on Religious Knowledge
Plantinga, ‘Divine Knowledge,’ 57.
136
