Page 134 - A Study of Theological Responses to Alvin Plantinga’s Aquinas/Calvin Model of Warranted Christian Belief - Kees van Kralingen
P. 134

Chapter 8
                                                    In view of his main conclusion, Moore prefers Marshall’s approach over that of Plantinga                 described the work of Plantinga (and Marshall) in terms of ‘closing the epistemic circle’                 misunderstanding of Plantinga’s work.
ugh Moore does refer to Plantinga’s own response to the challenge of  he seems to have misunderstood Plantinga’s point. As Plantinga has shown,                                                                                         argument     
                                              WCB       
 second step in Moore’s argument is his allegation that Plantinga’s approach in                                          that the reason for this lies in Plantinga’s view that the justification for beliefs is                                 misunderstood Plantinga’s approach. Warrant is different from deontological     de jure                                         
       Theology’s Epistemological Dilemma: How Karl Barth and Alvin Plantinga Provide a Unified Response      
  
 WCB 
   WCB  KCB       
     WCB 
 Moore, 326; he does refer to Plantinga’s discussion of what is known as the Great Pumpkin   WCB                    
 WCB 
132






















































































   132   133   134   135   136