Page 134 - A Study of Theological Responses to Alvin Plantinga’s Aquinas/Calvin Model of Warranted Christian Belief - Kees van Kralingen
P. 134
Chapter 8
In view of his main conclusion, Moore prefers Marshall’s approach over that of Plantinga described the work of Plantinga (and Marshall) in terms of ‘closing the epistemic circle’ misunderstanding of Plantinga’s work.
ugh Moore does refer to Plantinga’s own response to the challenge of he seems to have misunderstood Plantinga’s point. As Plantinga has shown, argument
WCB
second step in Moore’s argument is his allegation that Plantinga’s approach in that the reason for this lies in Plantinga’s view that the justification for beliefs is misunderstood Plantinga’s approach. Warrant is different from deontological de jure
Theology’s Epistemological Dilemma: How Karl Barth and Alvin Plantinga Provide a Unified Response
WCB
WCB KCB
WCB
Moore, 326; he does refer to Plantinga’s discussion of what is known as the Great Pumpkin WCB
WCB
132