Page 202 - Emotions through the eyes of our closest living relatives- Exploring attentional and behavioral mechanisms

Appendix to results
Table S11.1. Model output from Experiment 3.
Predictors
(Intercept)
Congruency (incongruent) Familiarity (unfamiliar) Congruency* Familiarity
Random effects ID (intercept)
b
6.334 -.002 -.001 .002
SE t
.007 934.0 .001 -1.88 .001 -.78 .001 -2.00
p
< .001*** .061 .445 .047*
Variance SD
.020 .141
Number of observations: 16949, ID: 444. Note that results are given on the log (not the response) scale. For clarity, 3 decimals are reported for the estimate, standard error, variance, and standard deviation.
Table S11.2. Exploratory analysis: Testing for effects of sex-combinations (dot-probe participant and photo participant), familiarity and congruency on reaction times in Experiment 3.
Predictors
Sex combination (M-M, M-F, F-M, F-F)
Congruency (congruent, incongruent)
Familiarity (familiar, unfamiliar)
Sex combination*Congruency*Familiarity
Random effects ID (intercept)
Residual
c2 df p
1.46 3 .691 1.46 1 .227 .61 1 .434 1.44 3 .696
Variance SD
.00 .07 .02 .16
Number of observations: 15326, ID: 402. Note that results are given on the log (not the response) scale, and that some samples are missing because we lost some data relating to sex and relationship. M = male, F = female.
200