Page 51 - Clinical relevance of current materials for cranial implants

Autologous bone is inferior to alloplastic cranioplasties
49 Kasprzak, P., Tomaszewski, G., Kotwica, Z., Kwinta, B. & Zwolinski, J. Reconstruction of cranial defects with individually formed cranial prostheses made of polypropylene polyester knitwear: an analysis of 48 consecutive patients. Journal of Neurotrauma 29, 1084-1089 (2012).
50 Ehrlich, G. et al. Immediate titanium mesh implantation for patients with postcraniotomy neurosurgical site 2 infections: a safe and esthetic alternative procedure? World Neurosurgery, 16 (2016).
51 Fiaschi, P. et al. Surgical results of cranioplasty with a polymethylmethacrylate customized cranial implant in pediatric patients: a single-center experience. Journal of Neurosurgery. Pediatrics. 17, 705-710 (2016).
52 Moser, M., Schmid, R., Schindel, R. & Hildebrandt, G. Patient-specific polymethylmethacrylate prostheses for secondary reconstruction of large calvarial defects: A retrospective feasibility study of a new intraoperative moulding device for cranioplasty. Journal of Cranio Maxillo Facial Surgery, 30 (2016).
53 Marbacher, S. et al. Intraoperative template-molded bone flap reconstruction for patient-specific cranioplasty. Neurosurgical Review 35, 527-535; discussion 535 (2012).
54 Marbacher, S. et al. Intraoperative patient-specific reconstruction of partial bone flap defects after convexity meningioma resection. World Neurosurgery 79, 124-130 (2013).
55 Cabraja, M., Klein, M. & Lehmann, T. N. Long-term results following titanium cranioplasty of large skull defects. Neurosurgical Focus 26, E10, (2009).
56 Luo, J. et al. Comparison of manually shaped and computer-shaped titanium mesh for repairing large frontotemporoparietal skull defects after traumatic brain injury. Neurosurgical Focus 33, E13 (2012).
57 Tehli, O. et al. Computer-based surgical planning and custom-made titanium implants for cranial fibrous dysplasia. Neurosurgery 11 Suppl 2, 213-219, (2015).
58 Manrique, O. J. et al. Craniofacial reconstruction using patient-specific implants polyether ether ketone with computer-assisted planning. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery 26, 663-666 (2015).
59 Lee, J. C., Kleiber, G. M., Pelletier, A. T., Reid, R. R. & Gottlieb, L. J. Autologous immediate cranioplasty with vascularized bone in high-risk composite cranial defects. Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery 132, 967-975 (2013).
60 Liu, J. K., Gottfried, O. N., Cole, C. D., Dougherty, W. R. & Couldwell, W. T. Porous polyethylene implant for cranioplasty and skull base reconstruction. Neurosurgical Focus 16, ECP1 (2004).
61 Lethaus, B. et al. A treatment algorithm for patients with large skull bone defects and first results. Journal of Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery 39, 435-440, (2011).
62 Blum, K. S., Schneider, S. J. & Rosenthal, A. D. Methyl methacrylate cranioplasty in children: long-term results. Pediatric Neurosurgery 26, 33-35 (1997).
63 Azmi, A., Latiff, A. Z. & Johari, A. Methyl methacrylate cranioplasty. Medical Journal of Malaysia 59, 418-421 (2004).
64 Werndle, M. C., Crocker, M., Zoumprouli, A. & Papadopoulos, M. C. Modified acrylic cranioplasty for large cranial defects. Clinical Neurology & Neurosurgery 114, 962-964, (2012).
65 D’Urso, P. S. et al. Custom cranioplasty using stereolithography and acrylic. British Journal of Plastic Surgery 53, 200-204 (2000).
66 Jalbert, F. et al. One-step primary reconstruction for complex craniofacial resection with PEEK custom-made implants. Journal of Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery 42, 141-148, (2014).
67 O’Reilly, E. B. et al. Computed-tomography modeled polyether ether ketone (PEEK) implants in revision cranioplasty. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery: JPRAS 68, 329-338 (2015).
68 Lethaus, B., Bloebaum, M., Koper, D., Poort-Ter Laak, M. & Kessler, P. Interval cranioplasty with patient-specific implants and autogenous bone grafts--success and cost analysis. Journal of Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery 42, 1948-1951, (2014).
69 Gilardino, M. S. et al. A comparison and cost analysis of cranioplasty techniques: autologous bone versus custom computer-generated implants. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery 26, 113-117, (2015).
70 Yadla, S. et al. Effect of early surgery, material, and method of flap preservation on cranioplasty infections: a systematic review. Neurosurgery 68, 1124-1129; discussion 1130, (2011).
71 Punchak, M. et al. Outcomes following polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cranioplasty: Systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Neurosci, (2017).
72 Honeybul, S., Morrison, D. A., Ho, K. M., Lind, C. R. & Geelhoed, E. A randomized controlled trial comparing autologous cranioplasty with custom-made titanium cranioplasty. Journal of neurosurgery 126, 81-90 (2017).
73 Pikis, S., Goldstein, J. & Spektor, S. Potential neurotoxic effects of polymethylmethacrylate during cranioplasty. Journal of Clinical Neuroscience 22, 139-143, (2015).
49