Page 49 - Clinical relevance of current materials for cranial implants
P. 49

                                Autologous bone is inferior to alloplastic cranioplasties
REFERENCES
1 Caro-Osorio, E., De la Garza-Ramos, R., Martinez-Sanchez, S. R. & Olazaran-Salinas, F. Cranioplasty with 2 polymethylmethacrylate prostheses fabricated by hand using original bone flaps: Technical note and
surgical outcomes. Surg Neurol Int 4, 136 (2013).
2 Stefini, R. et al. Use of “custom made” porous hydroxyapatite implants for cranioplasty: postoperative analysis of complications in 1549 patients. Surg Neurol Int 4, 12 (2013).
3 Iwama, T. et al. The use of frozen autogenous bone flaps in delayed cranioplasty revisited. Neurosurgery 52, 591-596; discussion 595-596 (2003).
4 Corliss, B. et al. Complications After In Vivo and Ex Vivo Autologous Bone Flap Storage for Cranioplasty: A Comparative Analysis of the Literature. World Neurosurgery 96, 510-515 (2016).
5 Malcolm, J. G. et al. Complications following cranioplasty and relationship to timing: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Neurosci 33, 39-51(2016).
6 Morton, R. P. et al. Predictors of infection after 754 cranioplasty operations and the value of intraoperative cultures for cryopreserved bone flaps. J Neurosurg 125, 766-770 (2016).
7 Yamamoto, Y., Mendel, E. & Raffel, C. Acrylic cranioplasty with alginate molding: technical note. Neurosurgery 41, 305-306; discussion 306-309 (1997).
8 Caro-Osorio, E., De la Garza-Ramos, R., Martinez-Sanchez, S. R. & Olazaran-Salinas, F. Cranioplasty with polymethylmethacrylate prostheses fabricated by hand using original bone flaps: Technical note and surgical outcomes. Surgical neurology international 4, 136, (2013).
9 Kim, B. J. et al. Customized cranioplasty implants using three-dimensional printers and polymethyl- methacrylate casting. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 52, 541-546, (2012).
10 Zanotti, B. et al. Cranioplasty: Review of Materials. J Craniofac Surg 27, 2061-2072, (2016).
11 Lindner, D. et al. Cranioplasty using custom-made hydroxyapatite versus titanium: a randomized clinical
trial. Journal of neurosurgery 126, 175-183, (2017).
12 Lindner, D. et al. Cranioplasty using custom-made hydroxyapatite versus titanium: a randomized clinical
trial. Journal of Neurosurgery 126, 175-183, (2017).
13 Zegers, T., Ter Laak-Poort, M., Koper, D., Lethaus, B. & Kessler, P. The therapeutic effect of patient-specific
implants in cranioplasty. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 45, 82-86, (2017).
14 Ng, Z. Y. & Nawaz, I. Computer-designed PEEK implants: a peek into the future of cranioplasty? J Craniofac
Surg 25, e55-58 (2014).
15 Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J. & Altman, D. G. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-
analyses: the PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol 62, 1006-1012 (2009).
16 Stroup, D. F. et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-
analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. Jama 283, 2008-2012 (2000).
17 Higgins JPT, A. D., Sterne JAC. Ch. 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies, (The Cochrane Collaboration,
2011).
18 Clavio, C. Romani Calendarii A Gregorio XIII. P. M. restitvti explicatio S. D. N. Clementis VIII. P. M. Ivssv edita : accesit
confutatio eorum, qui Calendarium aliter instaurandum esse contenderunt. (Apud Aloyfium Zannettum, 1603).
19 Foster, K. A., Shin, S. S., Prabhu, B., Fredrickson, A. & Sekula, R. F., Jr. Calcium Phosphate Cement Cranioplasty Decreases the Rate of Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak and Wound Infection Compared with Titanium Mesh Cranioplasty: Retrospective Study of 672 Patients. World Neurosurgery 95, 414-418 (2016).
20 Rotaru, H. et al. Cranioplasty with custom-made implants: analyzing the cases of 10 patients. Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery 70, e169-176 (2012).
21 Hill, C. S., Luoma, A. M., Wilson, S. R. & Kitchen, N. Titanium cranioplasty and the prediction of complications. British Journal of Neurosurgery 26, 832-837 2012).
22 Akan, M., Karaca, M., Eker, G., Karanfil, H. & Akoz, T. Is polymethylmethacrylate reliable and practical in full- thickness cranial defect reconstructions? Journal of Craniofacial Surgery 22, 1236-1239 (2011).
23 Chen, S. T. et al. 3-D titanium mesh reconstruction of defective skull after frontal craniectomy in traumatic brain injury. Injury 46, 80-85 (2015).
24 Ahn, D. H., Kim, D. W. & Kang, S. D. In situ floating resin cranioplasty for cerebral decompression. Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society 46, 417-420, (2009).
47
  






























































   47   48   49   50   51