Page 129 - The value of total hip and knee arthroplasties for patients

Return to work after total hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review
7
127
Table 1: continued THA
First author, Country
Study Design
Year Number of patients
Main inclusion criteria
Age; years
Gender;
n (%), male
Duration of follow up after surgery
Cowie et al. UK (21)
Prospective
2013 239 patients
285 hip replacements
Patients aged <65 years who underwent THA over a 5 year period
Mean age 55.2 (SD 7.2)
84 (35.2)
Mean follow up 3.1 years (SD 0.97) (range 0.58- 5.42)
TKA
First author, Country
Study Design
Year Number of patients
Main inclusion criteria
Age; years
Gender; No (%) male
Duration of follow up after surgery
Lyall UK (22)
Retrospective Prospective cohort study
2009 56
All patients < 60 years old who underwent primary TKA over an 8 years period
Mean 57.9 years (range 48-60)
33 (58.9) 38 (37)
64 months (range 47-112)
Lombardi USA (25)
2009 103 (compared with 103 patients with
A matched selection of 103 patients (115 knees) treated with primary cruciate retaining TKA in a 12-month period (Matched with 103 patients receiving primary medial UKA)
Mean 62 years (SD 10.0. range 41-85)
32 months (SD 10.4, range 2 to 52)
Foote UK (23)
Retrospective
2010 41 (study also included 37 patients
Patients <60 years of age receiving TKR (or PKR or UKR) over a 4 year period
Mean 54.1 years (range 44-59)
22 (37)
41.4 months (range 14-58)
Styron USA (24)
with patellofemoral replacement and 31 patients with UKA)
Median 57 years (interquartile range 52-61)
51 (31.5%)
6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months
Prospective
2011 162 patients
Patients scheduled for primary total knee arthroplasty, aged18-69 years who were employed and intending to return to work postoperatively
Unicompartimental knee arthroplasty UKA)
PFR: patellofemoral joint replacement;THA: total hip arthroplasty;TKA: total knee arthroplasty;TKR: total knee replacement; UKA: unicompartimental knee arthroplasty; UKR: unicompartmental knee replacement.