Page 128 - The value of total hip and knee arthroplasties for patients

Chapter 7
126
Table 1: continued THA
First author, Country
Study Design Year
Number of patients
Main inclusion criteria
Age; years
Gender;
n (%), male
Duration of follow up after surgery
Tanavalee et al.Thailand (4)
Prospective, uncontrolled 2006
35 patients (40 hips) 2-incision THA
All patients undergoing 2-incision or single-incision mini posteriorTHA in a 26 month period
2-incision: mean age 53 years
(range 34-75)
2-incision: 8 (23) males; mini-posterior: 20 (57) males
Minimum follow up 1 year;Actual follow-up awas 20.2 months (12-36 months)
Pagnano et al. USA (19)
Retrospective 2006
26
Patients with staged, bilateral THA over a 1 year period, one THA performed using 2-incision and the contralateral using min-posterior technique, and who had a successful outcome
Mean age 69 years (range 42-80)
10 (38)
Minimum of 6 months after the second THA;
Mobasheri et al. UK (20)
Retrospective 2006 Prospective 2010
86 patients (101 hips)
Patients ages <60 with unilateral THA
Mean age 51.4 years (range 29-60)
56 (65,1)
Mean follow up 3 years (range 0.5-10 years)
Bohm et al. Canada (15)
60 patients (of whom 54 were available for follow-up)
Patients who underwent THA and classified themselves
as being in the workforce preoperatively
Mean age 49.9 years in patients who returned to work and 60.3 years in patients not returning to work
53% male (21/40) in patients who returned to work and 17% male (1/6) in patients not returning to work
1 year
Nunley et al. USA (11)
Retrospective, multicenter 2011
806 patients
Patients aged <60 (males) or 55 years (females), regularly participating in moderate activities who underwent THA in a 30-month period
Mean age 49.5 (SD 7.21)
531 (65.9)
2.31 years (SD 0.76)
35 patients (36 hips) single-incision mini posterior THA
mini-posterior: mean 54.9 years
(range 38-76)
1 year