Page 146 - Crossing Cultural Boundaries - Cees den Teuling
P. 146
The table below highlights the destribution of the total number of the beneficiary organisations of the PUM Programme over the Federal Districts in the Russian Federation.
Table 13: Distribution of organisations participated in PUM programme from 2001 to 2011
Districts
Number of organisation
Percent
Central district
696
34%
Northwest district
526
25%
Southern district
42
2%
Ural district
560
27%
Volga district
241
12%
Total
2065
100%
Another influencing factor can be the level of activity of the local PUM representatives acting as intermediaries between all local Russian organisations that had ever requested an assistance and the PUM Institute in the Netherlands.
The distribution of the organisations in the field research is presented in the table below.
Table 14: Distribution of participated organisations over Federal Districts
District
Number of participants
Percent
Far East federal district
0
0,0%
Volga district
15
46,9%
Northwest district
7
21,9%
North Caucasus federal district
0
0,0%
Siberia federal district
0
0,0%
Ural federal district
9
28,1%
Central federal district
1
3,1%
South federal district
0
0,0%
Not applicable
0
0,0%
Total
32
100%
144