Page 277 - Demo
P. 277
Bibliography275BMitra Setia, T., & van Schaik, C. P. (2007). The response of adult orang-utans to flanged male long calls: Inferences about their function. Folia Primatologica, 78(4), 215–226. https://doi.org/10.1159/000102317Mitrovic, A., Goller, J., Tinio, P. P. L., & Leder, H. (2018). How relationship status and sociosexual orientation influence the link between facial attractiveness and visual attention. PLoS ONE, 13(11), e0207477. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207477Mitrovic, A., Tinio, P. P. L., & Leder, H. (2016). Consequences of beauty: Effects of rater sex and sexual orientation on the visual exploration and evaluation of attractiveness in real world scenes. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00122Møller, A. P., & Thornhill, R. (1998). Bilateral symmetry and sexual selection: A meta‐analysis. The American Naturalist, 151(2), 174–192. https://doi.org/10.1086/286110Morís Fernández, L., & Vadillo, M. A. (2020). Flexibility in reaction time analysis: Many roads to a false positive? Royal Society Open Science, 7(2), 190831. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.190831Mossotti, R. H., Baskir, E. A., Kozlowski, C. P., Franklin, A. D., Feldhamer, G. A., & Asa, C. S. (2018). Reactions of female cheetahs (Acinonyx jubatus) to urine volatiles from males of varying genetic distance. Zoo Biology, 37(4), 229–235. https://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.21420Müller, B. C. N., Leeuwen, M. L. V., Baaren, R. B. V., Bekkering, H., & Dijksterhuis, A. (2013). Empathy is a beautiful thing: Empathy predicts imitation only for attractive others. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 54(5), 401–406. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12060Nadler, R. D. (1995). Sexual behavior of orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus). In R. D. Nadler, B. F. M. Galdikas, L. K. Sheeran, & N. Rosen (Red.), The Neglected Ape (pp. 223–237). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-1091-2_22Nakamura, K., & Kawabata, H. (2014). Attractive faces temporally modulate visual attention. Frontiers in Psychology, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00620Nault, K. A., Pitesa, M., & Thau, S. (2020). The attractiveness advantage at work: A cross-disciplinary integrative review. Academy of Management Annals, 14(2), 1103–1139. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2018.0134Nedelec, J. L., & Beaver, K. M. (2014). Physical attractiveness as a phenotypic marker of health: An assessment using a nationally representative sample of American adults. Evolution and Human Behavior, 35(6), 456–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2014.06.004New, J., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (2007). Category-specific attention for animals reflects ancestral priorities, not expertise. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(42), 16598–16603. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0703913104Nieuwenhuis, S., Forstmann, B. U., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2011). Erroneous analyses of interactions in neuroscience: A problem of significance. Nature Neuroscience, 14(9), 1105–1107. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2886Nofrey, B., Rocha, B., Lopez, H. H., & Ettenberg, A. (2008). The effects of sexual experience and estrus on male-seeking motivated behavior in the female rat. Physiology & Behavior, 95(3), 533–538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2008.08.002O’Connell, C. A., DiGiorgio, A. L., Ugarte, A. D., Brittain, R. S. A., Naumenko, D. J., Utami Atmoko, S. S., & Vogel, E. R. (2021). Wild Bornean orangutans experience muscle catabolism during episodes of fruit scarcity. Scientific Reports, 11(1), Art. 1. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-89186-4O’Connell, C. A., Susanto, T. W., & Knott, C. D. (2019). Sociosexual behavioral patterns involving nulliparous female orangutans (Pongo sp.) reflect unique challenges during the adolescent period. American Journal of Primatology, 82(11), e23058. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.23058Ogura, T., & Matsuzawa, T. (2012). Video preference assessment and behavioral management of singlecaged Japanese macaques (Macaca fuscata) by movie presentation. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 15(2), 101–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888705.2012.624887Ohlsen, G., Zoest, W. van, & van Vugt, M. (2013). Gender and facial dominance in gaze cuing: Emotional context matters in the eyes that we follow. PLoS ONE, 8(4), e59471. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059471Öhman, A., Lundqvist, D., & Esteves, F. (2001). The face in the crowd revisited: A threat advantage with schematic stimuli. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 381–396. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.3.381Tom Roth.indd 275 08-01-2024 10:42