Page 69 - Breeding and regulatory opportunities, Renaud
P. 69
Seed Regulation in the US
Seed Initiative (2001), Restoring Our Seeds (2003), Organic Seed Partnership
(2004) and Northern Organic Variety Improvement Coalition (2009). In 2010,
Seed Matters, an industry-led foundation was set up to fund graduate research
in organic plant breeding and associated breeding and organic seed education
initiatives. The common purpose among these initiatives lies in training growers
for a range of diverse agro-ecosystems and crops, and in on-farm breeding and
organic seed production. Skills development includes management of variety
trials, dissemination of organically available germplasm to new regions, training
growers in on-farm breeding, developing new, organically-bred varieties
through participatory plant breeding, and developing unique variety release
mechanisms for the organic varieties bred through participatory processes.
For a thorough review of US organic seed initiatives focusing on participatory
approaches to organic plant breeding and varietal identiication, see Podoll,
(2009).
2.3.4 Resource mobilization
The diverse respondents consistently reported that the continuing regulatory
ambiguity has hindered the growth of the organic seed sector. Because the
regulatory process has remained open for interpretation and enforcement, many
stakeholders indicated that they had either not participated in the evolution of
the organic seed sector nor had mobilised resources to support development of
the sector. Others have taken a pro-active role. For instance, the establishment
of the OSA and the launch of the Seed Matters initiative were intended to guide
developments which optimised organic values. In order to demonstrate the
level of resources mobilized within the sector (and to identify opportunities for
future funding), the OSA and Seed Matters inventoried organic seed funding
initiatives. The resultant SOS report estimated that between 2002-2011 there
had been 57 public initiatives in support of organic seed and breeding, funded
to the sum of over $9,100,000, either through government or foundation grants
(some project funding estimated through 2014). The report categorized these
initiatives as follows: 30 breeding and variety trials ($6,800,000), 5 enterprise
development projects ($288,000), 11 seed production research and education
projects ($640,000), 5 systems development projects ($220,000), and 6 multi-
topic projects ($1,118,000) (Dillon and Hubbard, 2011). The majority were
initiated by universities, non-proit organizations and farmer groups, but the
major part of the funding came from government sources, namely in the form
51