Page 245 - Breeding and regulatory opportunities, Renaud
P. 245
Summary
results of the horticultural and phytochemical trait performance studies were
translated into a crop improvement strategy for broccoli cultivars adapted
to organic agriculture with enhanced phytochemicals by identifying the
parameters of an organic broccoli crop ideotype.
Chapter 2 reviews and analyses the evolution of organic seed regulation in
the US, as a model case of how challenges in a new regulatory area are being
addressed. The study draws on formal interviews of key stakeholders, participant
observation, and documents generated over a six-year period between 2007
and 2013. The chapter addresses three main issues: (1) how proposals for
the wording and implementation of the regulation constrain seed choices
and give rise to unintended consequences, (2) how emergent organizations
and procedures have responded to the tension between sustaining seed
diferentiation to match the characteristics of local markets, organic production
and agro-ecologies, and the narrowing of varietal choice in catalogued seed
so as to expand commercial organic seed markets and encourage organic
plant breeding, (3) why consensus on the content of formal seed policy has
failed to develop despite a high level of stakeholder engagement. The study
revealed that the oicial guidance on the interpretation of the regulation has
not been suiciently decisive to prevent divergent interpretation and practices,
and therefore the needs of a rapidly growing economic sector are not being
met. The chapter concludes by drawing lessons for key areas of regulatory
interpretation and practice, and by identifying possible ways to make organic
seed governance more efective.
In the US case, the regulators are waiting for the non-governmental stakeholders
to organize the sector to comply with organic seed regulations. Self-organisation
has been only partially achieved, and sector development is evolving too slowly
to optimally support organic seed market growth. While other on-farm organic
inputs are rigorously regulated (e.g. compost, manure), seed is seemingly not
recognized by the regulators as a signiicant input. At the same time the state of
the US regulation has put the organic sector at risk of violating organic integrity.
The regulatory ambiguity contributes to potential violations in the use of non-
acceptable seed and seed treatment inputs, and perpetuates inconsistency in
certiier seed regulatory interpretation and enforcement. It has failed (so far)
to establish a level playing ield among stakeholders. The organic regulation
227