Page 44 - (function(i,s,o,g,r,a,m){i['GoogleAnalyticsObject']=r;i[r]=i[r]||function(){ (i[r].q=i[r].q||[]).push(arguments)},i[r].l=1*new Date();a=s.createElement(o), m=s.getElementsByTagName(o)[0];a.async=1;a.src=g;m.parentNode.insertBefore(a,m) })(window,document,'script','//www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js','ga'); ga('create', 'UA-38829602-2', 'my-thesis.nl'); ga('send', 'pageview');

List of publications
1. MoojenWA,SchenckCD,LycklamaàNijeholtGJ,JacobsWCH,VanderKallen BF, Arts MP, Peul WC, Vleggeert-Lankamp CLAM. Preoperative MR imaging in patients with intermittent neurogenic claudication: relevance for diagnosis and prognosis. 2014. Submitted.
2. Moojen WA, Bredenoord AL, Viergever RF, Peul WC. Scientific evaluation of spinal implants; an ethical necessity. 2014. Submitted.
3. Van den Akker-van Marle ME, Moojen WA, Arts MP, Vleggeert-Lankamp CL, Peul WC. Interspinous Process Devices without bony decompression versus Standard Conventional Surgical Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Cost Utility Analysis. Spine J. 2014.
4. Moojen WA, Arts MP, Jacobs WC, van Zwet EW, van den Akker-van Marle ME, Koes BW, Vleggeert-Lankamp CL, Peul WC. IPD without bony decompression versus conventional surgical decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: 2-year results of a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Eur Spine J. 2014.
5. Overdevest GM, Moojen WA, Arts MP, Vleggeert-Lankamp CL, Jacobs WC, Peul WC. Management of lumbar spinal stenosis: a survey among Dutch spine surgeons. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2014 Aug 7.
6. Moojen WA, Arts MP, Jacobs WC, van Zwet EW, van den Akker-van Marle ME, Koes BW, Vleggeert-Lankamp CL, Peul WC; Leiden-The Hague Spine Intervention Prognostic Study Group. BMJ. 2013 Nov 14;347:f6415. Interspinous process device versus standard conventional surgical decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: randomized controlled trial.
7. Jacobs WC, Rubinstein SM, Willems PC, Moojen WA, Pellisé F, Öner FC, Peul WC, van Tulder MW. Eur Spine J. 2014 Feb;23(2):481-2. Answer to the letter to the editor of F. M. Kovacs et al. entitled“overviews should meet the methodological standards of systematic reviews” concerning “the evidence on surgical interventions for low back disorders, an overview of systematic reviews” by Wilco C.H. Jacobs et al.; Eur Spine J, doi:10.1007/s00586-013-2823-4.
8. JacobsWC,KruytMC,MoojenWA,VerboutAJ,OnerFC.JClinEpidemiol.2013 Dec;66(12):1347-55.e3. No evidence for intervention-dependent influence of methodological features on treatment effect.
9. Jacobs WC, Rubinstein SM, Willems PC, Moojen WA, Pellisé F, Oner CF, Peul WC, van Tulder MW. The evidence on surgical interventions for low back disorders, an overview of systematic reviews. Eur Spine J. 2013 Sep;22(9):1936-49.
172