Page 42 - When surgery alone won’t cut it - Valerie Maureen Monpellier
P. 42
Chapter 2
Table 4:
Meta-analysis on effect of depressive symptoms on weight loss in RYGB patients
Author, yr.
Hatoum, 2008 Silver, 2006 Kruseman, 2010 Alger-Mayer, 2009 Alger-Mayer, 2009 Alger-Mayer, 2009 Alger-Mayer, 2009 Alger-Mayer, 2009 Alger-Mayer, 2009 Alger-Mayer, 2009 Alger-Mayer, 2009 Sallet, 2007 Sallet, 2007 Sallet, 2007 Sallet, 2007 Gorin, 2009
Love, 2008 Love, 2008 Beck, 2012 Yanos, 2014 Fox, 2016 Wise, 2015 Wise, 2015 Brandao, 2015 pooled ES
95%CI
1.57, 4.85 -2.48, 0.82 -7.22,-3.98 -0.96, 2.30 1.95, 5.21 2.08, 5.34 4.37, 7.65 14.33, 17.59 12.77, 16.03 7.65, 10.89 4.74, 8.02 -1.66, 1.56 1.10, 4.32 -1.32, 1.90 -4.31, -1.09 -3.74, -0.46 0.30, 3.56 -2.18, 1.08 -2.43, 0.73 -10.48, -7.40 -2.67, 0.47 -0.28, 2.04 0.89, 3.79 -14.99, -11.67 -1.01, 3.95
FU
Depressive symptoms
No depressive symptoms
ES
BMI
EWL
N
BMI
EWL
N
12M
51.38
67.20
111
52.52
63.99
140
3.21
24.2M
47.43
82.82
69
49.97
83.65
71
-0.83
8y
46.73
65.90
80
45.46
71.50
48
-5.60
3M
50.50
47.91
64
51.14
47.24
93
0.67
6M
50.50
64.02
64
51.14
60.44
93
3.58
12M
50.50
73.83
64
51.14
70.12
93
3.71
24M
50.50
71.84
41
51.14
65.83
54
6.01
36M
50.50
75.43
25
51.14
59.47
36
15.96
48M
50.50
71.06
16
51.14
56.66
23
14.40
60M
50.50
67.39
9
51.14
58.12
14
9.27
72M
50.50
66.11
9
51.14
59.73
11
6.38
6M
45.03
57.19
70
44.95
57.24
119
-0.05
12M
45.03
73.51
65
44.95
70.80
117
2.71
24M
45.03
78.83
42
44.95
78.54
73
0.29
36M
45.03
66.63
8
44.95
69.33
14
-2.70
6M
46.50
56.80
47
47.40
58.90
57
-2.10
6M
46.40
51.16
48
48.42
49.23
68
1.93
12M
46.40
74.88
48
48.42
75.43
68
-0.55
23.2M
47.46
77.57
14
45.54
78.42
29
-0.85
8.6y
55.39
73.41
27
52.47
82.35
70
-8.94
12M
45.44
63.33
67
44.77
64.43
30
-1.10
6M
49.14
53.66
56
48.41
52.78
591
0.88
12M
49.14
71.31
56
48.41
68.97
591
2.34
28.6M
44.79
53.96
18
45.34
67.28
80
-13.33
48.35
66.91
1118
48.59
65.44
2583
1.47
yr. = year of publication; FU: follow-up in months (M) or years (Y); BMI: Body Mass Index; EWL: percentage excess weight loss; N = number of patients; ES: effect size; CI: confidence interval
42