Page 150 - A Study of Theological Responses to Alvin Plantinga’s Aquinas/Calvin Model of Warranted Christian Belief - Kees van Kralingen
P. 150
Chapter 8
on of Plantinga’s approach. “predilection for viewing the Bible as a ‘unified communication from God’ (Plantinga (2000), 399) over viewing it as a set of separate texts.” He states that “it is in the very variety of separate biblical texts that God’s unified communication is manifest.” given Plantinga’s reference to Wolterstorff’s work as mentioned above. In addition, in the passage of WCB mentions that practitioners of HBC “tend to reject the idea that Old Testament passage can be properly understood as making reference to Jesus Christ or to events in his life...”
Considering Brinks’ response as a whole, it has to be admitted that Plantinga has purpose of Plantinga’ belief and his extended A/C model, he needed to show how the Bible is God’s
to think about the implications of Plantinga’s One example is Wolterstorff’s description and explanation of how these two aspects relate
WCB
T.H. McCall, ‘Religious Epistemology, Theological Interpretation of Scripture, and Critical holarship,’ in: J.K. Hoffmeier and D.R. Magary (eds.), Do Historical Matters Matter to Faith?
148
8.8 Papers on the Question of Religious Pluralism
